Lmao, that makes you seem a bit unhindged. Too bad.

It’s not, I actually prefer it. I can’t see other people’s downvotes, either.

<3

What a gross comment.

Yeah, makes sense from that angle. Thanks.

Become the liquor, Rand.

I’ve noticed this too. At first, I thought that maybe it was just because I had some instances blocked and others were defederated on my instance. But I’ve noticed it happening with a lot of comments, sometimes hundreds, which doesn’t seem right…

My mom lives 900 miles away and she can barely turn a computer on

No, I understand it’s not about the specific technology, but I thought you were trying to imply that they were similar and that they produce the same results in reference to writing papers. My apologies if that was incorrect.

The internet is completely different, it’s not an LLM.

Aww, boohoo. You couldn’t back up your claims, spent hours arguing for them, and then have to end it with an embarrassing “blocked” like anyone gives a shit.

Competition is always good.

The argument is not if it can find them or not. The point is that most of the vulnerabilites it finds aren’t exploitable directly, and these are what are currently plaguing the open source community.

Yes, it can find actual exploits, especially if the attacker is motivated and knowledgeable enough. But the amount of slop like “this inaccessible private function has a bit overflow exploit if you change x variable before compiling” greatly outweighs the actual exploits.

Keep moving the goalposts, sure. The claim of yours that is entirely incorrect is that high interest rates bring down home prices. They have never done that in the US.

The emoji spam is a sign that you have completely lost the plot. Add it to the embarrassment pile.

Yeah, they have no idea what they’re talking about. They cannot provide any data to back up their claims, but apparently this hill is what they’ve chosen to die on.

Lmao, nice, still not providing anything to back up your claims huh? It would have been less embarrassing for you to just admit that you have no idea how economics work past supply and demand, and yet, here we are!

I have already figured it out, and that’s why I bought a home at 3.2% interest.

The US isn’t magic, it’s corrupt and unregulated. Supply and demand only applies in your freshman econmics class, not here, as you can very clearly see on the data I provided. You have provided nothing, not anything, to back yourself up. How embarrassing.

My instance has downvotes disabled.

They do teach the bible, but not in the same way. The Book of Mormon is an addendum/supplement to the bible, and they use it to help “understand” what the bible “really” means, and they use the bible to clarify things in the BoM as well.

Basically, they carry and read both.

They will not go up enough to make your claim valid, full stop. It has never happened in the way you’ve been claiming, so you can’t even point to the historical data to back yourself up, it seems.

Inflation is not something that needs to be included in this, and it only hurts your case further. Your original claim is that if interest rates go up (now you’re saying “a lot”, but it doesn’t change anything), home prices go down.

Well, in the 80’s, interest rates went way up, but housing prices didn’t go down, even in the short time period where inflation isn’t going to meaningfully be a factor. It went up at the a slow rate. So, you’re grasping at straws now (“correct the second for inflation” even though it didn’t magically make the housing prices go down in any way that matters) seemingly because you didn’t understand basic econmics in the real world and dug yourself too deep.

Are you going to provide any sources for your bold claim? Any amount of data? Anything? Or are you just going to keep talking in circles and not providing anything of substance?