The law can take down the fediverse. Well, suit yourself then.

Also not sure how one can do apologia without believing in what they’re saying.

So all those times people in Fedilore said “so-and-so was banned for so-and-so reason”, it was premature to say so?

We at least want Lemmy to not get the same fate Tiktok almost did, right?

I am starting to question the rationale behind admins banning people for being on toxic websites when people can say the same thing about the fediverse itself (take Leni for instance).

You can say that again.

Sounds like some other stalkers I know who respond to stuff.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the culprit is Leni/ShinigamiOokamiRyuu again.

I think all of you are just alt accounts from one and the same person who initially wanted to make Lemmy look more populated to draw in more users. But with time sanity went belly up and now the split personalities are fighting against each other.

This is already confirmed and well-established by how they all talk the same.

Because I see some people come off as stubborn and as doubting thomases who will make it seem like nobody condemns the guy.

Don’t noses have cartilage?

Same.

Currently Mamma Mia

The solarpunk bot banned me for a DM. None of us here are one person. If this is you playing nice, I’d be curious to know what your mean side looks like.

If “engagement” isn’t a metric of success, why do you maintain the numbers of people telling me to shut up is a metric of the need to be quiet? Especially when my only intent here was to share something I thought would fit the community, not to “crusade”? If 95% of the people in dbzer0 are those who will feel angst over every little thing, by your logic, does that make it a bad community? Because I can see through yours.

By unblocking them.

I wear them.

Even if the person changes?

An honest question is an honest question no matter how stupid it might sound.

The engagement didn’t seem to say so.

Someone must’ve considering the engagement for it.