nah it’s just amer*ans
uncritical support to all trans men who use absolutely absurd names
productivity is when a disabled person works for 60 hours a week so their landlord can buy more funko pops to scalp on eBay
Yeah! I’ve noticed this for a bit now and I made a whole effort post kind of sort of about this. It’s especially weird though because that isn’t my experience? Idk in my experience I want to share sexual experiences anyway, there isn’t a state where I say “welp I’ve had enough sex guess I never need to interact with anyone in a sexual way”, just like how I never really say “welp I had enough video games guess I never need to play a co-op video game ever”.
Big Edit: Actually that’s the thing I think these people miss, even when they’re credentialed like HealthyGamerGG. People’s social-sexual desires aren’t always the same as their solo-sexual desires and the fact we just assume they are is weird. And this is the very reason people get all scared about it, they recognize that there’s differences to these sexual things in social-sexual situations compared to solo-sexual ones, and they see how fulfilling the former can be, but then they make the jump that solo-sexual experiences can then substitute for social-sexual experiences BUT ARE ALSO less satisfying and therefore not a proper substitute. So they think there’s both something special about sex with other people AND that there’s nothing special about sex with other people, it’s a completely nonsensical position when examined closer.
You could argue that they’re just worried that people will miss out on general social interaction and that they think there’s no differences in the sexual aspects or desires related to solo or social sexual experiences, but I don’t think that’s true. If it was these people wouldn’t be concerned about it at all because friends exist and plenty of people can go ages without having sex while also getting plenty of social interaction.
Edit 2: beginning to think a huge portion of it is concern trolling about “weird” queer or neurodivergent behaviors or desires. Like an attempt to build a foundation needed to pathologize stuff like furries or even just kinks that are altogether more common in queer communities than straight ones. Actually, if you read Sexed Up by Julia Serano, they go over how the DSM pathologizes ethical and reasonable attractions and conflates them with unethical and fucked up stuff like pedophilia. So there’s precedent for this, too. We’ve been doing it for a while now.
yeah I’m becoming slowly more and more disillusioned with the “masturbation (disgusting, unhealthy, pathetic) vs abstinence (virtuous, clean, chad)” discourse
I can’t believe they’ve made xenomorphs illegal. They’ve been wonderful, wonderful wives for many decades now. Many people have been saying this.
What’s this? What’s this? There’s burning on the air!
What’s this? What’s this? Dead bodies everywhere…
“their atrocities justify our atrocities”
That also completely checks out to me.
I’m not too surprised tbh I think it would be weird if any (technically feudal?) historical human civilization didn’t have any sus stuff going on
So wait does this mean all the human sacrifice scawy dark ritual stuff could literally be made up?
Dredge tank probably shouldn’t delete posts for being TOO high profile. Otherwise stuff like this will happen. Better to leave it there and allow cross posting if it does end up fitting the dunk tank
lol someone needs to fix the weird attitudes in dentistry
Ugggh I hate clickbait
it astounds me how many people will base their lives around math and not realize that the point of basing your life around math is to allow yourself and others to actually utilize math and not to jack off endlessly about weird shit
Couldn’t you just not write a third? This makes no sense to me unless you strictly enforce having a third choice being necessary, which seems random and needless. If someone can just not have a third candidate, or not have a second candidate, I see no reason why that would negatively affect the system. Their vote is just lost if neither of their candidates win with their votes, same as if they didn’t go to vote in the first place.
Apparently there’s a Wikipedia article about rated voting and how it’s effectively spoiler proof. It doesn’t seem very “impossible”
If the issue is about people having high voter prediction accuracy, which leads to them voting differently, than you could just ban using machine learning dark magic or publicly distributing the results of calculations when it comes to elections
Wait so is it true that the lumpenproletariat are both supposed to be effectively bourgeoisie due to “exploiting labor”, and also include beggars? That seems almost comically incorrect and/or imprecise. Did Marx think this through if he really believed that?