GnomeGodsGnomeMasters [none/use name]

  • 3 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 10th, 2025

help-circle
  • Hannah Arendt (say what you will, but I fucks with her majorly) wrote a great essay called iirc: “Organized Guilt and Collective Responsibility” in which she discusses how the state intentionally drives a wedge between family life and civic duty, so that when the “small man” is finally frustrated by means of unemployment, he will turn to that last stage where he takes up any position — even that of hangman (paraphrased, albeit poorly).

    Basically, the state wants you to prioritize your family — women and children first! — over all else, so the state can get away with the shit they do. The most radical thing a person can do is prioritize civic life (organizing) over their desire for family etc., etc.

    It’s been a long time since I’ve read her, but all her work is worth a read imo — especially now.






  • Yes this is a good write up, and you are correct: Immune Globulin is the real expensive piece.

    For yall wondering, from what I understand, the immune globulin has a super short shelf life, which means it’s often discarded before use which inflates the price significantly. Further, since so much gets discarded and demand is relatively low, most supplies of the stuff are in more densely populated areas. As I mentioned below, I went to a middle-of-nowhere ER late at night which was a several hours drive away from the nearest available immune globulin which needed to be couriered to my location which also inflated the price tremendously, I’m sure.

    And yes, ER is definitely the right call. Rabies is 100% gonna kill you, and the vaccine is 100% gonna save your ass. The sooner you can get to a hospital and get the immune globulin the better. If you can secure and/or dispatch the animal that bit you and have it tested for rabies, that would be ideal but that very often is simply not possible. My understanding is that many major state universities in the U.S. offer rabies testing, but uh, don’t quote me.






  • I’m not gonna watch this long ass video, but bicameralism has kind of waxed and waned in popularity over the years. I read Julian Jaynes’s book many many years ago. There are pdfs readily available on the high seas. I believe it was called “the origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind” or something along those lines.

    Been a long time since I’ve really looked into this stuff, but if you think of consciousness as existing on a continuum rather than a binary yes/no proposition, then the idea that ancient civilizations weren’t “as conscious” as we are now might hold some water.

    I believe most modern cognitive scientists are fairly in agreement that our consciousness is in part defined by language, but not solely by language, and there’s also different kinds of consciousness (phenomenal, access, and so forth). Higher Order Theories (which when I was last into the subject were kind of the prevailing theories) basically are in agreement that higher order consciousness requires being able to have a thought about a thought about an experience.

    Actually I’m typing this and realizing I’m way out of my element and maybe someone more knowledgeable than myself can hop in here.

    Edit: as I recall, jaynes’s theory was basically derived from writings and whatnot. I think he basically said that consciousness emerged due to mass migrations of people post Bronze Age “collapse” and that the linguistic exchange was largely responsible for forcing the emergence of the self? Maybe? It doesn’t sound too out there to me. If I recall it’s how he arrived at his conclusions that I didn’t like… not that jaynes has a monopoly on bicameralism, he’s just the only one I was ever kinda sorta familiar with.