• 1 Post
  • 24 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2025

help-circle
  • I think there’s a 50% chance we went to the same theater, because I also went to see The Colors Within yesterday. I agree, great film. It’s interesting to me how Japanese entertainment tends to do a better job at telling a story where Christianity plays a role without being utterly obnoxious about it. Or maybe I’m just less suspicious about a Japanese creator’s intentions when it comes to this. Anyway, I did notice a slight plot hole, maybe?

    spoiler

    Early in the film, Totsuko suggested she would get in trouble with the school if they found out she was fraternising with a boy, but at the end Rui participated in the performance at the school festival without any problems.

    But well, it’s not that big of an issue.

    I already went to see Chainsaw Man a couple of weeks ago, which was great fun. I did like the first season quite a lot, but I enjoyed this different approach as well. Still a weird experience to go to the mainstream cinema and see an anime film in a packed house, though. That would have been unthinkable a few years ago.


  • I do think there’s a meaningful distinction to be made between something being attributed to a real person and a fictional character being loosely based on real people, though. Like, I think we can be pretty confident that the events in the Epic of Gilgamesh didn’t really happen (at least not literally), but if Gilgamesh was, like is generally accepted, a real person, the Gilgamesh in the Epic is most likely supposed to be that guy. Whereas Robin Hood was probably never meant to be any particular person.

    That said, do we actually know whether all the stories in the Bible about Jesus were originally about the same individual? The new testament was written decades and centuries after the death of historical Jesus, by people who didn’t even live in the region, right? So all the stories the authors heard would have come from traders and missionaries of Christian cults with vocal traditions. That alone is very long game of telephone, but I imagine every town at the time would have at least one person claiming to be messiah, and if one of them became a big enough deal that rumours around him spread beyond town, there would also be bunch of copycats. So a lot of room for mix-ups.

    “I am Jesus, your king!” “I heard Jesus was buried like three days ago!” “I uh- I have come back from the dead!” And then he skipped town ASAP.


  • Seems to me that the “market performance ratio” should weigh a lot heavier. The whole thing that makes something a bubble is that a lot of money is being put into it while very little is coming is coming out and there being very few prospects of that changing in the near enough future outside of religious conviction, yet this metric is the only one suggesting that investments creating real value should matter and it only accounts for 7.5% of the whole score. Then again, the site doesn’t actually properly define what “market performance ratio” means and doesn’t state its sources beyond a vague description.

    Also, the person who made this, Mert Demirdelen, is “head of growth and product” at Mobiversite, an AI app maker. His skills listed on LinkedIn include “AI” and “Blockchain”. So maybe not someone who is completely devoid of the desire to invoke a particular impression of the state of the AI economy.


  • There are valuable uses of learning models, but I’d say they all have the following constraints:

    • The relation between input and output is at most 1:1. So the output does not contain any information that cannot be derived from the input.
    • The scope is sufficiently constrained so that the error rate can be meaningfully quantified.
    • Dealing with the errors (including verifying that there are errors, if needed) takes less effort than just doing everything manually.


  • If you go to the official Japanese website of a show and look up where you can watch it, almost every time you’re presented with a list of close to two dozen streaming services. The exception is when one particular service (always an American one like Netflix or Amazon Prime) has exclusivity rights to it, but they’re the minority.

    Exclusivity deals aside, this seems to me like a much better setup, at least from a consumer perspective. Shows are for the most part not dotted across different services, but there’s no market consolidation. And even if something isn’t on the service you’re subscribed to, it will probably be available on a service where you can just rent an individual show or episode instead of having yet another subscription. And I imagine that if they’re not competing on hostage-taking, that would mean they’re competing more on price and quality of service instead.




  • We’re not currently on a trajectory toward automata like that, at least not with the kind of AI that’s currently heavily being invested in, but even if we were, it would not lead to a positive outcome with the way society is set up right now. The problem is that someone would own the automata and therefore be in complete control over in whose benefit the automata would work. Unless the automata are easy to make (and the patents easily bypassed), making it difficult for someone to monopolise them, it would take a fundamental change to the way the economy works for this to benefit everyone, and that’s not an inevitability.

    But this video isn’t really about that, it’s about the much more likely scenario that AI does not end up living up to its promises and the money eventually running out, and what the economic fallout of that will be.



  • If you’re directly interacting with any sort of binary protocol, i.e. file formats, network protocols etc., you definitely want your variable types to be unambiguous. For future-proofing, yes, but also because because I don’t want to go confirm whether I remember correctly that long is the same size as int.

    There’s also clarity of meaning; unsigned long long is a noisy monstrosity, uint64_t conveys what it is much more cleanly. char is great if it’s representing text characters, but if you have a byte array of binary data, using a type alias helps convey that.

    And then there are type aliases that are useful because they have different sizes on different platforms like size_t.

    I’d say that generally speaking, if it’s not an int or a char, that probably means the exact size of the type is important, in which case it makes sense to convey that using a type alias. It conveys your intentions more clearly and tersely (in a good way), it makes your code more robust when compiled for different platforms, and it’s not actually more work; that extra #include <cstdint> you may need to add pays for itself pretty quickly.