R* should have thought of that before doing union busting. Now management is left with bad options and have to decide which option is least bad, for instance admitting they were wrong, or let the situation decay further and potentially escalate the fight against their own workforce.
The more AI is being pushed into my face, the more it pisses me off.
Mozilla could have made an extension and promote it on their extension store. Rather than adding cruft to their browser and turning it on by default.
The list of things to turn off to get a pleasant experience in Firefox is getting longer by the day. Not as bad as chrome, but still.
They also moved to do away with the European civil liability regime, which served to harmonise firms’ obligations in the event of breaches, referring to national legislation instead.
So replacing 1 European civil liability regime by 27 different ones, one for each member nation.
I don’t see how that reduces red tape.
That’s a great ad for anyone selling pools.
It’s both, and not a small amount of bytes.
Adblocking is a more efficient way to make adversiting unprofitable, as it avoid wasting both yours’ and adtech’s bandwidth.
Wasting resources isn’t a great strategy, even if someone else is paying for it.
Not satisfied with polluting earth with resource-hungry data centers, Google is looking into polluting earth’s orbit.
Lasers that can disable drones aren’t cheap to buy nor easy to find.
Recent events shows Europe probably need this kind of defense systems.
Is this clickbait, or is the story as omnious as the headline suggest?
if a 100% effective cure (or preventative) for cancer comes around, what will be the next big goal?
Making the cure accessible. Some cancer treatments are more effective AND much more expensive. Companies may be looking for return on investment, or the treatment is tailor-made from the patient’s own cells, and inherently labor intensive and hard to produce.
Either way, curing 100% of the richest 5% who can afford it isn’t the most satifying outcome.
the printing process requires much less energy and produces many fewer greenhouse gas emissions than traditional TFT manufacturing methods
A carbon tax would make this kind of production process more viable commercially than more polluting processes.
It’s necessary not only to have the technology, but also the right insentives.
“Unfortunately, the National Science Foundation program that we were pursuing funding from to continue working on this, called the Future Manufacturing program, was cut earlier this year. But we’re hoping to find a fit in a different program in the near future.”
It sounds like the US may not even have the technology with cuts to research. Don’t be surprised if another country leapfrog the US again in electronics production.
Bien joué. Est-ce qu’il a été plus facile d’arrêter la cigarette électrique que la cigarette classique ?
It sounds like all of this is voluntary, so the slow pace is not surprising.
Let’s make polluters pay with fines that amount to carbon price for leaked methane + a 15% penalty to pay for the monitoring.
Pas surprenant de voir du contenu nocif sortir de Tiktok, X, et de la génération par IA.
Ces réseaux et générateurs de bouillie doivent être évités, surtout pas promus. Mieux vaut manger son vomis.
Maybe brush the cat more, so it doesn’t feel the need to clean itself as often. Or at least swallow less fur and whatever is in that fur.
Du coup, depuis que tu a arrêté, ton fils doit être ravis avec tous ces LEGOs ! ;)
Now, find an enzyme that can break down fossil fuel & plastic companies.
If that’s the time it takes to do it right, then it’s fine.
This is huge for the Euro and economic independence, better not mess it up.
You may be right, but I don’t see how that change the calculus. Should employees and union be complacent with corps’ bad and potentially illegal actions (firing for being in an union is not legal in some areas), refuse to defend colleagues, just to avoid hurting the corporation pride?
Anyway, we’ll probably hear more soon, and will see how this play out.