This would make sense if the argument wasn’t used like Trump wouldn’t do the same. “Genocide joe” is just a bad argument when comparing presidents, not on it’s own.

We can talk about what Biden is doing wrong, but that’s not why they are bringing it up as the only argument they have.

Plus, Trump is going to turn around and enabled a second genocide in Ukraine.

Ok there chatgpt.

This would make sense if i had made any of those points. Clearly if youre making arguments like “genocide joe” you’re just in bad faith, because it’s genocide presidency atm.

You may not have understood the game yet, but people who aren’t ready to serve the military industrial complex don’t become president.

So youre saying you think Trump doesn’t support genocide? Or are you saying it doesn’t matter you just wanna bash Biden.

Congress loves genocide, doesn’t matter which president.

Guy let it go. You’ve already admitted you understand that Israel is killing children because the Palestinian government is fucked. A lot of us understand the nuances of the Palestinian government being fucked, we still don’t think it should be open-season on the Palestinian kiddos, civilians and hospitals.

That being said, you may go have passionate intercourse with your cranial apparel.

Oh I see, killing childen is okay because of “those people who are making israel do it”. Makes perfect sense now thank you.

Unlike all those Palestinian kids amarite.

Right. Nothing to do with Israel killing a large number of aid workers and destroying supplies, while killing civilians who try to get to them. It’s Hamas holding back sitting on piles of food… Makes sense.

Most don’t even care about rights, god or children, it’s about owning the libs.

So they can strap the aid workers to the front of their trucks maybe

Could you quantify “sometimes”? Asking for my wife

What is this garbage headline and tldr.

At least nine people have been killed and 25 injured in what appear to be coordinated attacks by gunmen in Russia’s southernmost Dagestan province, local authorities say.

Attacks have been reported at multiple places of worship and a police traffic stop in the cities of Derbent and Makhachkala, which are about 120km (75 miles) apart.

Among the dead are seven law enforcement officers, a priest and a church security guard, according to local authorities. One of the law enforcement officers killed was the head of the “Dagestan Lights” police department, Mavludin Khidirnabiev, according to the Dagestan Ministry of Internal Affairs’ Telegram channel.

Four “militants” have also been killed, according to the Russian news agency TASS.

After his arguments failed to convince bylaw officers, Ruck took his case to court. Legal precedent supports naturalised gardening in Ontario, where in 1996 a court ruled that Sandy Bell, a Toronto gardener, had the right to express her environmental beliefs through gardening, overturning a fine issued to her under the city’s weeds and grass bylaw.

But Ruck, who represented himself, lost his case on procedural grounds after arguing that the city had applied the bylaw unfairly and arbitrarily. Now on the hook for the municipality’s legal bills of $6,000 (£3,450), he has filed an appeal.

Damn that sucks

deleted by creator

That’s the neat part, you don’t!

And you know he is only doing that because he 100% knows how Russia takes care of their wounded (they don’t).

Imagine how fucked all the Russians are going to be when they go back home to their 3rd world shithole. Let’s just hope they take it out on Putin.

The truck is not really washable. They will absolutely fuck it up cleaning that out. It can’t even resist rain.

So youve donated a bunch and now stopped? Right? Anakin?

This answer literally means: nah not the part that is easily provable, I mean the part I made up and choose to believe without evidence.

It’s funny how little evidence you actually need to believe covid was a hoax, and the amount of evidence we have it isn’t. It’s almost like you’re part of a cult.

While Trump was saying this, he was vaccinated too. You got played

I can go through the dictionary all day. That’s called activism my dude, and it was an excellent way to being attention to a particular issue they are campaigning for.

The act is self-evident in regards to their purpose lmao. They “painted” the environment (polluted it) in a way we could all relate to, in a effort raise awareness on other things happening in the environment that aren’t as visible.

It’s called raising awareness in society. This kind of coverage costs millions of dollars, and it only happened because they involved something visible we all care for in a way.