“if he was captain of MS-13, it would make a difference.”

it would, if there is corroborated, documented evidence someone is a captain of a violent gang, rather than someone with no criminal history and a sigmund freud tatoo.

that makes a difference.

“…claim a guy was captian of MS-13…”

this is basically what is happening now from official sources, my related comments in this post discuss this exact issue.

but you don’t have to fall on one side or the other.

if someone is a violent offender and gamg member, that should be considered.

if someone is not, as in this case, that should be considered.

and as the post is about, due process should be inviolable.

all three are simultaneously correct.

I don’t think anybody’s arguing about the necesiity of due process here, what with it being the point of the post.

not from the comments I read, anyway.

looks like it turned out great, congrats. I like making my own marinades and sauces, do you add a lot of other ingredients or is it primarily the preserves and burboun?

I’m always trying to simplify my sauces

“Even if dude were the captain of MS-13, it doesn’t matter.”

being a captain of an international gang that murders and rapes people would matter.

pretending it doesn’t is ridiculous.

“Dems buying into this phony racist hysteria about MS-13”

okay, you are confused.

rump is not a democrat, he is an extremely conservative republican.

MS-13 has been around for over 30 years, and the democrats I have not overreacted, extreme conservatives are the one overreacting.

“They’re just serving their masters in the prison industry.”

again you’ve got conservatives and progressives mixed up.

conservatives are obeying corporate masters; they literally hired the corporate masters to run the country.

that’s even better, to have someone who can make a great experience miraculous

I love this book and it is part of what happened to my brain.

signed the petition, thanks for reposting this.

the internet archive is an invaluable cultural resource.

hey you, that looks delicious, you. great cookin

wow yum nice yum wow.

did you make the glaze?

I appreciate it.

there’s so much “I think I heard” in official White House press announcements and law enforcement documents that I feel like it’s important to be as responsible as possible without our words.

I don’t think anybody’s arguing about the necesiity of due process here, what with it being the point of the post. not from the comments I read, anyway.

It’s irresponsible to say “i think i read that he does have affiliation” when there is no documented evidence.

there’s a big difference between a proven gang member and a random person wearing a hoodie, and your statement blurs those lines.

thanks for the link, I’ve read his report.

there is zero documented evidence even of gang affiliation, according to that FBI report.

that is very important to note.

clean record, no documented gang affiliation, wearing a hoodie, one CI allegedly said he has a nickname with no corroborating evidence.

his gang affiliation would mean something if he had a gang affiliation, which he does not.

it’s only harmful to bring up an alleged affiliation when one does not exist.

can you provide a source for the affiliation?

his tattoos are of dice and Sigmund Freud by the way, notably not of MS-13, a group to what he has no established connection.

in case you don’t know, there is the option under user settings to hide bots.

in about 3 weeks, he’s actually going to shout this at somebody.

“a discussion”

whatever you have convinced yourself of, making things up and then asking misleading questions based on your imagination is not a discussion.

not nearly so much as you adore not asking questions and expecting answers.

“your silence is deafening.”

I responded to every single comment, even your fabrications and extrapolations, correcting your mistakes every time.

I have no obligation to hold you by the hand here.

if you want an answer, stop whining about how difficult questions are to ask and stop fabricating things.

Respectfully and directly ask a question without misleading disclaimers or insults.

if you just want to keep insulting and attempting to mislead me and rewrite my comments, I’m happy to indefinitely correct you and play the game.

“Do you not have eyes?”

i do, I told you I just made sure the reasoning was still written out and publicly available, which it is.

“structurally identical…”

wow, your structures are identical with or without 20 disclaiming paragraphs of misattribution.

no wonder you have such difficulty asking direct questions.

“literally quoted every time you”

you certainly haven’t.

" and you accused me of guessing. "

nobody “accused” you, you said “i have to guess”.

and then you guessed.

I pointed out that there is no point in guessing when you can ask direct questions.