What s ridiculous premise.

"Somebody said ‘wtf’’

Guess that’s all she wrote, then.

Hi, I know nothing about the drag scene, curious about the definition here.

I thought drag was specifically men dressing up as women, is drag any gender putting on too much makeup and wearing gaudy outfits?

It’s just the look?

Three courses? Do they mean that the bread and then the drinks are the other two courses?

Holy cow, I burst out laughing like six times. So funny.

Beatles albums then, rain sounds now

Anyone considering getting this game, get it!

Its predecessor, sunless sea, has the best writing and worldbuilding of any game I’ve ever played.

Whatever second place is, it’s not even close.

The characters feel like real people. Everything feels real.

Absolutely amazing storytelling.

I was very excited to see this game on here, because I haven’t got around to playing it yet.

But if it’s anything like sunless sea, it’s also going to be amazing.

Hey there, I’ve been playing borderlands a few days now.

It reminds me a lot of outer worlds, which I absolutely loved and played through twice.

You might want to give that a try.

I don’t know about irreversibly, but the remarkable and consistent gains in solar technology especially are extremely exciting.

As soon as one of these prototype next-gen batteries hit, that’s it for fossil fuel.

It’s already not worth it to continue using fossil fuel commercially, but as soon as the next-gen power storage is able to be produced on scale, power plants are changing, phones, computers, cars, everything’s going to change.

I can’t see that being more than a decade out, but even if nexgen battery tech doesn’t hit, the constant improvement on s***** traditional battery tech now is improving rapidly.

It is a very exciting time and energy production and storage.

I really liked this movie. It’s absurd fun.

It’s very weird, and Daniel Radcliffe is a weirdo who likes weird movies and he’s a great actor and so is Paul dano and so is Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

This comment about odoo software made me think of that Bowie song from labyrinth where he says “voodoo who do you do the power of the baaabe!”

So things are really looking up.

I had to read it like six times before I concluded that there was something wrong with the article and not my reading comprehension.

Maybe a third party will come along and help both of us out.

The article seems to contradict itself.

You are right, it says that the part on the jurors was lifted, but then a few paragraphs later it says:

“While he lifted that piece of the gag order, the judge ruled that a prohibition on disclosing juror information will remain in effect until further notice.”

So if that’s correct then it’s only the witness that the ban has been lifted on.

But why is the article saying two different things about the jurors?

And why the heck would any part of the gag order be lifted at all?

Weird

Poor Sotomayor.

She’s the single wise, rational, compassionate justice who not only has to consistently voice and explain the correct rulings that her asshole conservative peers avoid an order to consolidate wealth and power, but she also gets so much collateral shit because she’s lumped in with all those assholes.

The study begins by adding up how many people self-reported taking multivitamins in some reports, then they added up the dead humans.

Pretty simple.

I thought I said there were no relevant variables and parameters? I’ll check.

Yes, I said relevant in point four.

I guess I could have used it in two and three also, although I think it makes sense in context.

I stand by my earlier comment and don’t see the need to edit it to add in the word “relevant” to further dunk on an irrelevant paper.

Here: There are no relevant controlling variables or parameters that make this study useful.

It’s not even a curio because any number of factors could influence the conclusions of their addition.

I can tell you that it’s illegal in China to park e-bikes inside anymore after entire buildings went up in flames because everyone piled their e-bikes next to each other and when one caught on fire they all caught on fire.

When you walk into most Chinese apartment buildings, there’s a flyer or placard with a picture of a apartment building on fire and a public notice not to bring your ebike or ebike battery inside under penalty of prosecution.

I would also wager that the lacking BMS has quite a bit to do with it.

Awesome, enjoy.

Looks cool, I will snag

*waggling finger guns at ya, bruther.

There are many problems with this post and this study:

1. This study did not conclude that there are no health benefits from taking multivitamins, that’s a false equivalence made by the poster.

2. This study has no parameters for the quality or types of vitamins taken other than “multivitamin”

3. This study exclusively reports the correlation between mortality and multivitamins, which is an inconsequential and useless statistic without any parameters.

4. This study does not take into account any variables apart from a lack of long-term health disorders among multivitamin takers.

This is relevant as many people take vitamins specifically to rectify long-term health disorders.

Then again, seeing as how their only metric was mortality and not efficacy on health, that wouldn’t have mattered in this study.

5. Objectively, a large percentage of the multivitamin market are older people, who are more likely to die.

This could be one of the explanations for the 4% higher mortality rate in multivitamin takers. I’m sure there are others, since no variables are parameters were taken into account or structured into the study. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2820369

This “study” is the sum function on an Excel sheet that counted the number of deaths connected to the number of people who reported taking multivitamins, which is a useless number without controlled parameters or variables taken into account.

The study means nothing.

Probly need to make em longer.

That’ll probably fix it.

Yyyep.