Proof once again that the only good emoji is the struggle session emoji.

I’m sad to say we must never really have tangod zed if you’re going to confuse me for someone who would ever invoke the disengagment rule. Oh well.

These things happen

That’s what they say to anything.

Pig poop balls also isn’t funny, it’s a crutch. Someone occasionally has a funny reaction to it (which is why it is fondly remembered, like the post hog joke that is now apparently banned), but most people just roll their eyes and say something smug and annoying about discourse or civility in return.

Let us never rest on the laurels of our bits and may a thousand new ones blossom daily.

Good, bad, apart from the original comic, it just isn’t funny.

This could have been the only funny post on the fake news comm.

The Duality of Posts

Pixels on Screen, 2023.

Hah classic Catradora bamboozle you rascal.

If y’all are going to struggle session you could at least try to have fun while doing it.

I’m fucking livid

She’s not here, do you want me to pop into that thread and chastise her for you?

My mind just boggles at the fact that anyone is taking this two bit reddit clone seriously enough to carry a grudge longer that the lifespan of a single thread.

It takes all kinds.

She’s probably like 16 dude chill and welcome to the Internet where people fling the most unhinged nonsense at each other without a second thought

Haha, classic Catradora_Stalinism, what a rascal.

I’m not saying it’s not a thing, but I have literally never seen it used, and I couldn’t find an ngram viewer with a corpus end date after 2019.

It would never occur to me to say “go off queen” , in much the same way it would never occur to me to say “yass slay king” regardless of the gender of the referent, making them both gender neutral in my use.

The idiom isn’t gendered, a component of it is. Likening someone to ‘the little dutch boy with his finger in the dyke’ makes no claim on the gender status of the referent and is equally applicable across all genders. If they insisted on calling you Mr. Egon, then sure, that’s misgendering, but ‘go off king’ is a established turn of phrase that I have also seen generically applied because it likewise makes no claim to the gender status of the individual referred.

The only way I think it can be construed as misgendering language is if the parts of the idiom or turn of phrase are parsed individually, which is exactly the opposite of what you’re supposed to do with an idiom.

If this sentence is misgendering myself, then I’m the Queen of England. I get that this guy is a shithead but pretending that he’s also doing something wrong here seems to be playing for some esoteric own.