Syfer 🔒⚡ Shock

@onlinepersona +1
prima donnas like Stewey on In Living Color: “Look what I kandoo!”

@onlinepersona Q. What change would you like to see in tech?

A. No more surveys about what changes I would like to see.

@onlinepersona I’d like to see less skinny-jeans male faux feminists in tech and more big-chested manly men. I would also like to see less dishonest feminized virtue-signalling from soydev bugmen about what great feminist egalitarians they are. We all know that’s bullshit.

@leo Leo, you have Stockholm syndrome. Linux Desktop is a disaster.

@Laser My experience is representative for enough people to show that Linux Desktop is a mess and is not suitable for production work. I don’t identify myself by my choice of software. I just want to get work done.

@JustinHanagan A Nazi under every rock.

When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a heil.

@theshatterstone54 > “Reason for that being that Wayland is built with Linux in mind and would not work under FreeBSD without a lot of effort bwing put in as it uses some Linux-specific components or libraries.”

Not so. FreeBSD is 100% Linux compatible and has Linux Kernel emulation built in. Wayland support is also built in to FreeBSD. FreeBSD is a much superior operating system compared to Linux. But the FreeBSD team only cares about the server aspects and really does not care about a graphical desktop. They tend to use Macs.

FreeBSD Documentation Portal

The state of Linux Desktop interface is a schizophrenic flustercuck with far too many cooks spoiling the stew. They’re not just spoiling the stew; they’re pooping in it. And a bunch of noveu-riche trust-fund baby nerds think this is cool. They don’t give a rat’s ass about the end user being able to get work done. They would rather we all waste our time filing bug reports rather than getting things done.

@leo KDE with Wayland was all crashy when I tried it. If Wayland windowing is as buggy and crashy as their browser we’ll all need to switch to Windows or Mac just to get any work done.

@L4s This dumb broad would need to ban the Federalist Papers, too, since they were anonymous.

McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission ~>

“Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority […] It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights and of the First Amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation […] at the hand of an intolerant society.”

www.eff.org/issues/anonymity

Tricky Nikki said:

“Every person on social media should be verified by their name. It’s a national security threat,” she said. “When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say and it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots.”

Her handlers just want to control all narratives. She doesn’t care about Russian bots. Nikki Haley is a bot.