hello_hello [undecided, comrade/them]

pfp: ah_to_hk separatist Hong Kong political cartoon that ironically made Olympic gold medalist Vivian Kong look very based. (src)

Read Free Software, Free Society pls

  • 2 Posts
  • 291 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 11th, 2024

help-circle
  • These media depictions were almost entirely born out of the illegal dissolution of the USSR and the subsequent “special period” (Cuban term but it can apply here) that these countries faced.

    It is one of the most horrifying successes of western propaganda that the images that the public is fed about socialism are images taken from the mass death and slaughter of the 90s as the most direct result of capitalism replacing communism.

    As a side note, people on this site denouncing the DPRK as “revisionist” and not a “complete revolution” are embarrassing AF considering the DPRK is doing all the socialist wet dream development projects that these clowns dream about in their own countries. The people in North Korea worship their revolution while other countries deal with how their youth are addicted to western nihilism.






  • Describing AI as a fascist artifact is really well thought out. It’s often difficult to describe the layers of extraction and oppression that a technology goes through in its manufacturing. I also like to rebuttal that technology also can’t be inherently antifascist.

    Our world is full of fascist technologies. The blockchain crowd is basically living in a fascist soup of inhumane and antidemocratic ideas. A lot of surveillance tech is no better than “AI”. We are having a general problem here.

    It is a bit disappointing that the author doesn’t provide an explicitly Marxist interpretation but I do appreciate not centering the conversation entirely on AI, which is just a symptom of a larger trend of capital accumulation and dispossession.

    Some people look towards “Open Source” as our salvation but while I love Open Source and consider the amount and quality of open source infrastructure available to all of us a modern wonder of the world more impressive than the pyramids that crowd also doesn’t want to be “political”. The accepted open source licenses all are built around libertarian thinking, about empowering the individual who does not want to be regulated and limited in their individual expression: Not around the idea of expressing and manifesting political values. Open source licenses do not allow you to forbid using your work in weapons. Do not allow you to limit using your work only for socially beneficial endeavors. Open source is impressive, but tries to be apolitical and therefore does not help us fight back fascism. It wants to stay neutral. But there is no neutrality when standing in a wildfire.

    This is a succinct condemnation of the meritocratic argument of the “Open Source” camp which is rooted in the idealism that the experts of any particular field can overpower capital just through sheer force of intellect (“biologists will solve hunger by inventing humans who never eat!”). The Free Software Movement has condemned this line of thinking since its inception and has always made the use of published and collectively owned works important for its ethical and social value and never based solely on its utilitarian value.

    I’ve experienced this firsthand with NixOS. It had destroyed its own community by appealing to a false meritocracy without ever tackling any material issues such as funding and governance. The idea was that if the technology was improved that it would be the rising tide that would solve everything (or at least make the problems worth tolerating). Needless to say this tracks with the obliteration of people’s needs and justice over a ideological bent towards what the status quo defines “success” as.

    I respect projects which explicitly forbid any and all LLM generated contributions in any form but I also greatly respect projects that actually have a political backbone on top of that.








  • Unironically Korra is probably one of the most reactionary shows on TV back then: every relationship was a toxic affair where abuse was tolerated, communism is bad because the leaders are either hypocrites or live in luxury. Environmentalism is bad because the tree huggers are secretly hitler. Anarchy is when you execute and torture people for fun and also its an ideology for the mentally unwell. Anyone who wants anything to change will cause fascism to take hold and also the fascists are heckin cool with gundams and nukes (also democracy comes when the ruling class wants it to) and last but not least: gay people get 3 seconds at the end.

    The show is a cultural artifact of the 2010s liberal mind body politic, it was scientifically engineered to only be enjoyed by those who believe fully in the liberal world order as the ultimate truth. It’s probably no wonder it became the poster child scapegoat for the alt-right manosphere since it was so safe to hate on.

    This basically doesn’t exist for its predecessor which was a historical analogy for the Japanese occupation and colonization of Asia, basically nothing to latch onto, just some anti-China brainworms (they named a prison “lake laogai” after the labor prisons in China) which were everywhere at the time.