Not going to continue to discuss that here though.

why because it’s a garbage argument that immediately reveals itself to be bullshit? we could very easily sustain projected populations under a system of more equitable resource distribution and the destruction of the capitalist class

How does the newspaper obsession advance this idea?

Can I get it with zero sugar?

Seize the 100 larget corporations - create a new economy for the people

Overthrow the dictatorship of the rich - build a democracy that serves the working class

End the rule of money and lock up the corrupt elite

Cut the military budget by 90% - peace, not war with China & Russia

End the war on Black America

Defend women’s rights, full equality for LGBTQ people

Save the planet from capitalism

He was actively involved in anarchist organizing with Serve the People in Akron, OH.

All I know is that whatever comes next, we absolutely seem to deserve all of it, b/c we brought this on ourselves.

Speak for your fucking self. What the fuck did Palestine do to deserve this? Migrants? Trans kids? Women?

Unfortunately due to the election he’ll need to leave those left wing ideas to the side and go for somewhere between 100% Hitler and 99.8% Hitler.

These people are so dumb. Who will work there?

lol

In my DnD setting, all orcs are twinks or gentle butch lesbians.

1. is squirt pee?
2. is squirt pee?
3. is squirt pee?

Seems like in that situation the first question to ask is if the devil is real

We are watching an actual genocide unfold in Gaza right now and it is impossible for Israel to hide it from the world. When will we finally get a single image from China depicting this so called Uyghur genocide? There’s not one image of death camps, mass graves, or dead bodies. How on earth is that possible? Internet access is extremely widespread in China.

is the Party for Socialism and Liberation

Love my Kobo H20. Had it for about three and a half years now. Full connectivity with Overdrive/Libby means almost everything I read I get from the library, but it’s also super easy to upload any EPUB and PDFs. Plus it’s fully waterproof; one time I dropped it in a swamp river and had to root around in stinky mud for 15 minutes to find it. It was working totally fine once I finally pulled it out.

enshittification planet

The IDF isn’t even claiming this. They say there’s no evidence. That means if you repeat this, you are quicker to believe propaganda about Palestinians than the IDF.

The owner at the very least risked a lot of time and money to get the business going, and it would have been a while before they hired someone else to do the job. It’s not like they just sat back and did nothing.

This is absolutely not always the case. Many businesses (most, I’d bet) predate their current owner. And what is the risk? I don’t get why this obsession with undefined “risk” is so important. What’s the absolute worst case scenario? Their business shuts down and they have to go work for a wage like everyone else?

On a very small scale they sometimes work, when they get larger scale they usually have a CEO and upper management like any other business. In the end it’s really not that different. Look at REI for example, it’s a co-op, has a CEO, and at least in my area has pretty average pay and benefits. They have laid off people recently due to profit concerns, and have ok ratings on job sites. What is the advantage to these exactly?

REI is a consumer co-op, not a worker co-op, and that’s mostly just a marketing gimmick. If you go to the store, you can pay $20 to become a “Co-op Member” for life and get discounts. I’m talking about worker co-ops, where the ownership and operation of the firm is shared among its employees. There are shitloads of these at small scales, but there are a few big ones - Mondragon and others in Spain, Uralungal in India, Huawei in China, etc. In my city, the largest industrial laundry operation is a worker co-op, and they have a practice of providing capital and expertise to other local businesses to convert into co-ops. However, it should be noted that the conditions for a worker co-op in capitalism are very different than they would be under socialism. In capitalism, they are at a competitive disadvantage on the market, because they will pay their workers more and thus have tighter margins. In socialism, that’s not an issue.

Can you give me the best example of a current city, country, or whatever that is closest to what you think is best for the US to change to?

Economically, China, Cuba, and Vietnam operate under Marxist governments using different approaches to planned economies that place a large emphasis on worker power within businesses. It’s been enormously successful for all of their development and quality of life. You could look at a number of Latin American countries where socialist parties contest with liberal/capitalist parties in electoral politics and see the success they tend to have under the more left wing governments. Here, Bolivia is an excellent example. They’ve had a socialist party (MAS) in power for over a decade and quality of life, life expectancy, poverty levels, literacy, public health, and education have all improved dramatically. But they are not truly a socialist country (even in the restricted sense of the explicitly Marxist states I mentioned above) because they still operate in a mixed economy where the capitalist class wields massive economic and political power, and the socialist parties in power work to restrain the capitalists and build alternative models. Nowhere on earth aiming for socialism isn’t in a process of active struggle against the global capitalist powers-that-be, and that struggle looks very different under different circumstances. I don’t just want the US to change to the Chinese model or something, but I do want an economic model much closer to the examples I’ve given here, though substantially adjusted to the conditions of the US (and the need for the US to make reparations for imperialism).

Since they run the business I assume they will be making a lot more than the rest of the employees, right?

It’s important to note that in many cases, owners do not run the business - they hire someone else to do it for them. Now, if the founder (not an owner in this context) remains in a prominent and valuable leadership position, they will probably be one of the highest paid people in the firm. But we’re talking a difference of 3x-10x the lowest paid worker at the most, not the 400x you see in CEOs today. Ultimately pay decisions are made by the board, which is elected by workers (and potentially union leadership, community members, government regulators, etc, as befits the particular firm).

Do you really think that can work? I think you will have a very hard time getting people to agree to put their money into stuff like this.

I mean, co-ops and governments all over the world already do it, so yes, I don’t see why it would suddenly stop working.

Ah, yeah, let’s just restructure the whole system into some untested idea, that’s going to go over great with everyone. How would you even start making this change?

Again, you’re speaking to a bunch of revolutionary Marxists. We do, in fact, want to restructure the whole system. That’s what I’m telling you. We want to fundamentally change the way property ownership works. The only way it would happen is if there’s a mass popular movement to make it happen, so those of us in capitalist countries spend our time organizing around this, creating parties and other groups that can hopefully bring about this change. These ideas not untested, however - many countries implement some component of worker ownership and state planning into their economy at all kinds of different scales. Some countries operate under Marxist governments that work to implement these on a society-wide scale, often with a great deal of success. We can learn from that success and from the mistakes those governments made/make. Not untested at all.

So the people who put in the most risk and started the company get nothing more than someone who joined 20 years later?

They’ll get as much as they continue to put in.

How do you expect companies to get created if the owner constantly loses more and more of their company the bigger it gets?

State and worker directed capital funds that vet and invest in new firms.

Why risk any of this money in the company when it isn’t even his anymore?

We will structure access to capital such that we don’t depend on profit-sucking capitalists to grant it to us.