

Correct, you’re as useless as you claim others to be.
Only an obtuse dickwad would cry about others while doing absolutely nothing themselves
Correct, you’re as useless as you claim others to be.
Only an obtuse dickwad would cry about others while doing absolutely nothing themselves
Sorry you may have forgotten to include what you are specifically doing to help move the needle. That’s probably the most important bit here to show how you are leading by example
obligatory fuck snoop
Finally people are starting to wake up to this bullshit. They are not to be trusted
Thank you! I want my data to go directly to Putin, not through some google middleman!
Do you think the person you’re responding to controls the US military?
If this woman were to disappear for some indeterminate reason, would the case still continue?
They would be everywhere
Oh you sweet summer child
When I read your comment it seemed like the blame was being cast at both sides. It’s important to me that everyone else on the internet who might see this thread knows that “both sides”ing gets shit on.
Please carry on if you must.
Removed by mod
“bOtH sIdEs” makes anyone sound really, really stupid when one side is building concentration camps
So to be clear: because some unknown small sliver of the population may have an issue with it, you want to bubble wrap all of society?
That sounds pretty conservative to me. Too much, even
Obviously tools can be used for unintended jobs - but the point is they’re not the optimal tool in the moment
Of course there’s “nothing wrong with it,” it’s just something I’d stop and explain to a kid or elderly relative why they’re not getting the best results
OK but that’s not a question anyone ever would or should ask AI. If you don’t know the difference between web search and text transformers then you’re playing with tools you don’t understand well enough to use effectively
This is fear mongering disguised as “science”
A population-based retrospective cohort study of 9.8 million people in Ontario, Canada, found that people with an emergency department visit for cannabis use or cannabis-induced psychosis were at a 14.3-fold and 241.6-fold higher risk of developing a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder within 3 years than the general population, respectively.4
So another way to state this: people who are prone to mental health disorder are likely to LEARN ABOUT IT with cannabis, but it’s not causing healthy people to go crazy
Some prohibitionist jumped on this to spin it as propaganda
Why are you commenting if you don’t have the 6 seconds to understand the discussion?
Every time you would have made an edit, send a note to a representative in government
We know this strategy is a failing one
Let’s just start sooner
This is my circle is called “magical thinking”
Obsidian would solve most of the gripes in this article
Privacy nightmare, no thanks