Rest easy knowing that this didn’t happen
Rest easy knowing that this didn’t happen
“His”
The thigh holster is so optimistic
PS4 and PS5, lunar silver star story and lunar 2 eternal blue
Ok that’s what I thought haha, I was confused - I thought the title might have meant the refs blew a call and he went out. Instead he just broke ankles
Wait not having seen the game - does it look like he should have been tackled but made the play, or did the refs miss him going out of bounds or something? I’m confused by the title
Yeah I ran into the same issue with my family. I love smoking but not everyone does.
Try cooking smaller cuts or amounts, or something like pork butt that you can eat fresh and then reuse the rest in a chili or something that does freeze well. I know you wanna feast - I love a good all-out too - but that’s not a sustainable way to live, honestly. We shouldn’t eat so much rich food so often, so I ended up making the big grill a once in a while thing and cooking small amounts more often.
No, no, see it was the right of private gun ownership in Afghanistan. Just the guns nothing else necessary. And, by the way, “we could be like Afghanistan “ is actually a very good argument and not at all an admission.
\s
Why? The people weren’t injured by cops. The cops were nearby when their service weapons shot bullets at a deadly armed suspect. They can’t be held accountable for the suspect’s actions! He made their guns fire. \s
Honestly the cops were barely involved. They’re practically victims here, at least as much if not more than the people who were shot. \s
Legally a mass shooting
No no, surely the solution to this is a mechanical one
Guarantee it’s just racist
Pick who you want to be farting next to the entire flight. For me, it’s 4.
Crimson Heart disabled it?
In theory for multiple comparisons they “share” a value of P such that a significant result adjusted for four comparisons is evaluated against a P-value of (0.05/4) = 0.0125. This correction (called the Bonferroni correction) is the most restrictive method used for controlling family-wise error rate. Most researchers would adjust P using a less restrictive method, which is not necessarily wrong to do. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_comparisons_problem
Otherwise I agree with your logic
You’re moving the goalposts. Before it’s fully sufficient for a billionaire to say it, then it has to be billionaires and the media, and now they have to also be proposing specific types of solutions for it to count. I’m just curious exactly what counts as US national policy and what doesn’t. And last I checked “circlejerking about what Palantir says” isn’t working out great either.
It’s pretty clear that large portions of the ruling class do in fact want cheap drugs. That’s why you see the oligarch owned media constantly drumming up support for lower drug costs by reporting on how expensive they are, and Mark Cuban has a website he says is cheaper.
Is that what all billionaires want? Is it accurate? It’s the same standard. It’s not that you’re wrong about what a lot of rich US ghouls want. It’s that your argument is lazy and dishonest. You can be right AND not tout Palantir as a source of anything other than bullshit!
I assume taxing the rich is obviously impossible so the only solution is squeezing the poor \s