Kidde and first alert are kinda on par with each other, why they are sold at the big box stores.

Anything with a metal head that’s serviceable, I have a strike first in my home, one of the cheaper “commercial” call them brands.

If you don’t know any, condos and stores have them, look at one of their service tags and give them a call, most shouldn’t have an issue making a sale and potentially repeat service business.

Fire code requires their service, so most commercial places should be following along, but that depends on also how much your FD and jurisdictions cares to enforce the rules.

Now you have, in our pantry corner.

Swassties

SWeaty ASS n tesTIES

Yeah no, keep your swassties to yourself.

Every 6 years it needs a 6-year service and every 12 years a hydro test. Other than that it can sit up off the floor anywhere you want.

Just want to point out.

Kidde does not have good running with extinguishers.

Get a badger or Amerex, and get it from an actual supplier, they’ll know the good ones and keep it serviced for you too.

a person who is forced to work for and obey another and is considered to be their property; an enslaved person.

How does it not? Being drafted means the government or pharaoh owns you. Do they have any other option as a laborer or slave already?

Do you not know what the term “Slave” actually means?

Because you seem to have ignored the “forced” aspect every step of the way here.

I mean at the same time

Ancient Egyptians were able to sell themselves and children into slavery in a form of bonded labor. Self-sale into servitude was not always a choice made by the individuals’ free will, but rather a result of individuals who were unable to pay off their debts.[

Several departments in the Ancient Egyptian government were able to draft workers from the general population to work for the state with a corvée labor system. The laborers were conscripted for projects such as military expeditions, mining and quarrying, and construction projects for the state. These slaves were paid a wage, depending on their skill level and social status for their work

They used slaves for everything and paid them, so having a paid receipt is a weird distinction to try and make something less worse than it was.

Ancient Egyptians were able to sell themselves and children into slavery in a form of bonded labor.

Were they? Got anything to support that? They even use the term slavery for their labor…

Edit, oh man… bad look…

Several departments in the Ancient Egyptian government were able to draft workers from the general population to work for the state with a corvée labor system. The laborers were conscripted for projects such as military expeditions, mining and quarrying, and construction projects for the state. These slaves were paid a wage, depending on their skill level and social status for their work

They even say they pay their slaves.

I believe the difference is being forced, they didn’t have another option, to say no to laboring was to be turned into the slave chaste regardless. Slavery by other means, is still slavery.

What about being forced into this that makes it slavery that’s so hard for you to comprehend here?

Don’t some bosses have a specific response to using a flask in some games?

You mean the link you provided that doesn’t talk about sex crimes at all? Thats what you want to support that strict liability applies to sex crime? The link that says it doesn’t? You sure?

Your point was strict liability should apply here in This case, when asked why, you provided strict liability. Now the at we hopefully found out why, you can educate yourself, that it usually doesn’t apply for sexual crimes… that’s the topic.

Should someone pissing in the trees have a blanket law applies to them, we know they exist, I’m laughing and pointing out how stupid it is to apply it in situations like pissing in a corner.

Zero, zero results for sex in your link you claim specifies it. Fucking amazing lmfao.

So crotches are considered inherently “ultrahazardous” since that’s the metric it says applies. Good take away.

That’s quite a bit different than someone pulling their weiner out and peeing against a tree where no one can see anything. I hope you can see this.

Not for sex offenders like pissing in public, of course it exists in other areas of law, but those aren’t applicable to all other areas.

Source for EU? And for sex offences atleast.

Sounds like you’re trying to apply other law areas with strict liability to this one blanketly, which isn’t how it works…z

As a semi aside blanket laws are no good anywhere, you’re not advocating for blanket laws are you…? Hope not.

If it originated there, why doesn’t Canada have it lmfao.

I can actually make that argument, and a very good one that intent is very important.

Of course, that’s not a thing in every country. This is the same country that applies murder to criminals when cops kill people, so not surprised they wouldn’t care about intent for other laws.

What a wild fucking place lmfao.

This is the same place that charges criminals for murder that police do yeah…?

Maybe the issue is the basis of the laws in your country to even begin with…?

These aren’t normal laws in other countries fyi.

Intent matters for laws that are meant to be used properly.

Unless they intentionally exposed themselves, pissing in public shouldn’t net you a sex offenders list standing.

Most (proper laws) laws require intent. Unless they purposely exposed themselves… Peeing in a corner exposes nothing and doesn’t fit any definition of “intent”. Why would this suddenly be any different?

These blanket laws are usually to get vagrants being in an alley.

It’s not a double standard, it’s a blanket law that shouldn’t exist to begin with lmfao.

Pissing in public shouldn’t net you a sex offender list ANYWHERE, where is the intent to expose to someone else or a minor? But bloviate about double standards I guess… yeesh lmfao.