We absolutely need to have the freedom lever set to the max with this one, all these problems have the “dictator efficiency” crowd coming out the woodworks

I hope the eu commission withers under the rise of syndicalist unions

Gay people called, theyre here to give you your anxiety back ( maybe do something about the balls)

Its not inevitable, I do think that anarchist syndicalism is the best vehicle for stopping this. We can change whats cool, we can be accepting and capture the zeitgeist with interesting social relations rather than purely technological developments.

Also desk fans are ok, i have one pointed at me rn

Ah ok ty!

it does have something to do with that name, he gets to brand it into the social fabric with his money

since “liberal” as an adjective is used for a wide variety of opposing projects

liberal is a confusing word to begin with and further I dont know if you are calling that to me or to others

go rejuvinate in your obama temple

Why would you hope that as I presume you desire egalitarianism?

I am actually not picking up your nothingnesses, please genuinely explain

Please a least give the grace of understanding that the critique was faced at building funders not grocery purchasers.

Is this projection on your part :D?

Im a student right now, but otherwise, the normal story, what do you imply?

I work towards anarchism, i dont understand

here is berkman with makhno in a bathing suit

yep, private funds mean nothing, there is no moral good in having money and paying things, it is a moral bad because it rallies labour of people who owe you nothing to your own will. All of those so called ( libraries are good but this is the creators personal controlled environment, and it is not good for housing obviously) facilities are shitty ideas of useless people, material in useless shapes, wasted labour and now defended from free usage by a violent state.

Yeah the waste is the labour not the money directly. I think the labour has to be the focus, we can talk about how much the billionaires can do with that money, but its the labour that we need to worry about and its self control.

I think kind people should push for regional economic independance or at least verification of its viability and acknowledgement that they are working their fair share.

Then one can be sure that at least from your point of view, the exploited worldwide are free to choose their own fate, and you are not a leech.

Economic independence is a useful tool, in that when one is economically independant, it can also be determined for certain that any external law or force is unjust and not a component of livelyhood.

Its not the welfare policies its the tentacles in the global south and the violence that keeps that in place

It was done for 3 years in the catalonia region before they were killed by the joint right wing forces of leninists, fascists and monarchists.

So for initial questions about logistical feasibility, that is where to look. Also the black army in ukraine, as well as the zapatistas in chiapas.

A lot of labour does not change, the key difference is an abandonment of the inherited monarchical notion of the nescessity of a single mind to accumulate all information in a region and then command accordingly.

It asks the question, what is there attracting people to central control but fear?, and if there is anything outside of fear such as logistics, which is keeping hierarchy in place, how can we as self controlling individuals come about to achieve and surpass those same structures?

So in this context, your question is a logistical one. I would say that in enquiring about the logistical feasability of a lack of hierarchy, to please consider the extent to which the current world is conditioned for hierarchical operation, and that more liberal conditioning of the surrounding environment is possible. By that I mean that tools, techniques and customs can be developed for the purposes of direct worker democracy, and that in that different environment, it may look quite feasable indeed.

Many of us are concerned with the approach to such a condition, regardless of an unmeasurable feasibility metric, we will never in any moment have a map of the future, as does any political disposition, so this is no detriment to the anarchists.

The philosophy of freedom that allows one to be trans, or more-rather allows the expulsion of the millennia old dead notions, does have a strong history to that which is roughly classed as existentialism, such as stirner or de-bouviour