x87_floatingpoint [he/him, it/its]

Transmasc computer toucher creature meow-floppy cat-trans

Death to America

  • 4 Posts
  • 132 Comments
Joined 9 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2024年10月29日

help-circle










  • Next one… I think here, the main tell would be how the bridge disappears into nothingness? The thing the other people in this thread mentioned about little details being wrong. And the way how the metal rods that make up the bridge are unnaturally blurry/squiggly/whatever.

    The reflection in the lake might be wrong, too, but I don’t really know how that’s supposed to look. Guy’s face is a little blurry, but I could be convinced that that’s bad camera settings if not for the bridge. He’s wearing a clothing that doesn’t have buttons. Right hand looks normal, but left hand is unnaturally tiny, even if well-formed.


  • That’s a helpful checklist! Just tried on this image from a recent post about an AI-generated game video:

    • Eyes and the face look surprisingly okay, except for that one deep line that goes right across his nose. Thought at first that he’s wearing glasses, but apparently he’s not.
    • Reflections are inconsistent, there’s a car reflecting on the ice when there is no car that could cast that reflection
    • I guess whoever published that picture was smart enough to pick a frame that doesn’t show hands… No buttons on the jacket, either
    • I’m not sure what a car dashboard is supposed to look like, but this does not look right
    • Weird detail: WTF is that red thingy on the house supposed to be
    • This particular one gets watermarked by the AI, but I’m trying to learn how to spot it without that

    Good quote, indeed they’re getting hard to spot, it made a very realistic face for the guy… I guess all I can do is practice to at least spot the most obvious ones. Surely they’ll be used a lot for misinformation in the coming decade, I want to be prepared.








  • It seems like westerners (even the so-called “progressive” once) are horribly racist towards the DPRK people in particular. Like, more so than their average hatred of anyone on the us-foreign-policy. The DPRK has suffered so much at the hands of the imperialists, first the imperialists occupied the southern half of the peninsula, then in the war 1950-1953 they killed like 25% of the population and dropped thousands of bombs on Pyongyang and on all the land, committed massacres against the Koreans both in the north and in the south, quite similar to what’s happening in Gaza now. (And now the anglo-burn think their grandfathers deserve to be respected for having done that. If there’s a hell, all the Yanquí soldiers will burn there )

    Then they’ve been imposing very harsh sanctions on the DPRK since the 90s. Because how dare a people want to feed themselves and have technology and industry and a nuclear programme for self-defense.

    And now the average anglo-burn thinks it’s funny that their technology is sometimes outdated and that they’re very reverential (is that a word?) of the leaders who led them through these difficult times, made good decisions that lets them still survive as a country instead of going the way of the USSR ( ussr-cry ).

    I’ve seen the way westerners of today talk about DPRK, what they would do to these people if given the opportunity. I am glad the DPRK has nukes. I hope they build more nukes, all the nukes. There is no reasoning with westerners who don’t see you as a human being. Only way to deter them is that if the imperialists invade again, their own land gets hit wit the nukes. Never give up the nukes.

    Death to America.