• rosco385
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Because analysing network traffic wouldn’t allow an adversary to see what you’re sending with Signal, but they could still tell you’re sendig a secure message.

    What the Guardian is doing is hiding that secure chat traffic inside the Guardian app, so packet sniffing would only show you’re accessing news.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      analysing network traffic wouldn’t allow an adversary to see what you’re sending with Signal

      How are they analyzing network traffic with Signal? It’s encrypted. And why does it matter if they know you’re sending a message? Literally everyone using Signal is sending a message.

          • eronth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It’s a red flag to those who think you’re going to share internal info.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Or it’s just a perfectly normal thing that billions of people do every day?

              • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Except that signal is blocked by many companies Mobile Device Management. The one that don’t can typically see who has the app installed. This provides a new clever way to maybe whistleblow