I still think there are multiple conditions under a conflationary diagnosis, still in an infancy of understanding what’s going on. Like maybe some are being chemically lobotomised, and the damages are being covered up, thrown into this broad-bag diagnosis of autism, for the corporation to save on paying out for damages.

I wonder if that may help explain people like that. And I wonder if explanations like that would change the minds of people like that.

Or maybe she’s pro-vaccine like I’m pro-vaccine, and points out some things sold as vaccines are not vaccines…? Or… Or… Really not enough information available to cover all the quirks of nuance in that, before playing with Hanlon’s razor.