Your book, like Elizabeth Hinton’s “America on Fire,” delves into a decades-long cycle that’s played out in many US cities: Police violence, followed by uprisings, followed by promises for reform and blue ribbon commissions that ultimately produce only “modest change and a photo op.” Did you come out of your reporting with a solid idea of what a better process would look like?

Ellis: I don’t know how you can look at Minneapolis today and say they are better for choosing reform over revolution. The mayor reorganized the public safety department, then there was turnover in the leadership there. The chief who was supposed to lead the transformation of the police force recently resigned in disgrace. Like most police departments in the country, the budget continues to balloon thanks to overtime costs. And at the moment the city is failing to even meet the basics of its court-mandated reforms. By definition this is insanity, right?

I think like anything in local government, having a process for the community to guide designs and offer feedback is important. But I think the starting point has to be a total tear down, not a rebuild. That sounds simplistic, but look at where making changes on the edges has gotten us? Revised training standards and use of force policies have amounted to departments that are effectively the same. The aim needs to be so much higher.

  • deft
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    But that’s such a dumbed down misunderstanding.

    The one guy fell apart because he couldn’t make decisions and fell to decision paralysis. While the other two were faster decision makers.

    It’s not like the two guys liked each other, their goals conflicted too. The anarchists were just the far easier target because they failed at what it takes to win warss. Logistics. Which requires decision making from a hierarchy of some kind.

    Anarchy has unstable leadership. Have you ever been part of a group with unstable leadership facing a group with stronger, more stable leadership? Sports is the easiest example for this I can think of, a strong coach is literally central to an effective sports team. A strong central power is essential to an effective government. You need decision makers who aren’t subject to playing musical chairs all the time.