Here’s the entire thing if you don’t want to go to that link:

There were a series of accusations about our company last August from a former employee. Immediately following these accusations, LMG hired Roper Greyell - a large Vancouver-based law firm specializing in labor and employment law, to conduct a third-party investigation. Their website describes them as “one of the largest employment and labour law firms in Western Canada.” They work with both private and public sector employers.

To ensure a fair investigation, LMG did not comment or publicly release any data and asked our team members to do the same. Now that the investigation is complete, we’re able to provide a summary of the findings.

The investigation found that:

  • Claims of bullying and harassment were not substantiated.

  • Allegations that sexual harassment were ignored or not addressed were false.

  • Any concerns that were raised were investigated. Furthermore, from reviewing our history, the investigator is confident that if any other concerns had been raised, we would have investigated them.

  • There was no evidence of “abuse of power” or retaliation. The individual involved may not have agreed with our decisions or performance feedback, but our actions were for legitimate work-related purposes, and our business reasons were valid.

  • Allegations of process errors and miscommunication while onboarding this individual were partially substantiated, but the investigator found ample documentary evidence of LMG working to rectify the errors and the individual being treated generously and respectfully. When they had questions, they were responded to and addressed.

In summary, as confirmed by the investigation, the allegations made against the team were largely unfounded, misleading, and unfair.

With all of that said, in the spirit of ongoing improvement, the investigator shared their general recommendation that fast-growing workplaces should invest in continuing professional development. The investigator encouraged us to provide further training to our team about how to raise concerns to reinforce our existing workplace policies.

Prior to receiving this report, LMG solicited anonymous feedback from the team in an effort to ensure there was no unreported bullying and harassment and hosted a training session which reiterated our workplace policies and reinforced our reporting structure. LMG will continue to assess ongoing continuing education for our team.

At this time, we feel our case for a defamation suit would be very strong; however, our deepest wish is to simply put all of this behind us. We hope that will be the case, given the investigator’s clear findings that the allegations made online were misrepresentations of what actually occurred. We will continue to assess if there is persistent reputational damage or further defamation.

This doesn’t mean our company is perfect and our journey is over. We are continuously learning and trying to do better. Thank you all for being part of our community.

  • radfrog
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    LTT? Linus Tech Tips? Am I missing something here…?

    • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      At the same time it came out that they were pretty shitty to one of the products they reviewed and some other terrible reviewing practices they had, sexual abuse allegations came about. That was a while ago, but thankfully it seems they investigated themselves and found no issue. Works for the police, works for LTT.

      • Strykker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I see you can’t read.

        They hired an outside group to come in and perform an investigation, this is like the exact opposite of what police “internal investigations” do.

        • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Canada’s largest”, but companies don’t hire you if you consistently make the companies paying you look bad. Like HR, these sorts of companies help protect the people paying them.

          • Strykker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Jesus fuck you all so fucking cynical it’s a miracle you can put your pants on without shitting them in fear.

            • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              You didn’t even see a report from this company, just what LTT said they said, and you believe them outright. This is what being a fucking shill is, man. Can’t you see that daddy Linus isn’t going to reward you for your blind loyalty to him? He’ll never notice you and your blind devotion.

              • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                You don’t put out a statement saying “This company looked at us & found this:” without running the statement by the company in question first.

                Well, you can, but you’ll usually find yourself in hot water if the things you’re claiming the company found run contrary to what they actually found.