Credit Andy Singer 2024

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The Jewish settlers didn’t live in Palestine, they lived in Europe and then moved to Palestine to steal the land. They’re white.

    Just because one ancestor a dozen generations ago lived somewhere doesn’t mean you have a right to evict the actual people living on that land.

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Palestinians didn’t live in Palestine during that time, either. they migrated when everyone else did.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        A ton of them just converted from Judaism. This idea that Arabs flooded into Palestine after kicking all the Jews out is racist revisionist history.

        • JoYo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          that’s not what I said at all.

          they migrated when everyone else did.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            How am I supposed to read this as anything other than “Palestinians migrated into Israel when the Jews migrated out”? Which, I must reiterate, is a racist myth.

    • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t agree on wording in the first paragraph, but do agree with the second paragraph.

      What now? Evicting all 8 millions of Israeli to make Hamas happy?

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        How about ending apartheid and making a multiethnic, multi-religious democratic state from the river to the sea? Israelis can become Palestinian, they don’t need to leave.

        • MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Hmm which state is apartheid again? The one that is 20% Arab where they have full rights… Or the one that is 100% Arab where anyone who is not like them is killed with extreme prejudice?

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          How about ending apartheid and making a multiethnic, multi-religious democratic state from the river to the sea? Israelis can become Palestinian, they don’t need to leave.

          have you ever seen an israeli or a palestinian?

          Neither like eachother. And honestly for good reasons. Good luck with that idea.

          TL;DR this is basically like going “why dont the USSR and US just become one state” during the cold war.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            They don’t like each other because one is a colonizer coming to steal land and ethically cleanse the population. If they stopped doing that I think they could get along.

            Black people and whites mostly get along on the US these days. Different peoples can live together.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              maybe, but we’re also forgetting that this has literally been a thing since the founding of israel, older than most of entire living families, and most of their grand parents as well.

              I’m not really sure something like this could just be “swept under the rug” and forgotten in such a manner, though if they decided to do a one state solution, i’m not going to stop them either lol. I just think a two state solution is the only realistic solution here, given the historical context and pretext of the conflict.

              Black and white people mostly get along now, which is true, but it took many, many years. For that to actually be the case, 1964 was the year the civil rights act was passed. But this was also a population that was subjugated and had their rights removed, not one that is militarily backed into a corner. So these are a little bit different.

              Plus we also can’t really apply US culture onto the middle east, they just experience the world differently over there.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                It would definitely require a process similar to denazification in Germany, where the people are reeducated and all members of the previous administrative apparatus are removed from power. Like the radical reconstruction in the South after America’s Civil War (before white terror overthrew their multiracial democracy I mean)

                But Jews live in Germany now, and Germany is a great friend of Israel. Much like Black people in the US and whites, things can change.

                We’re all human, I have no idea why you think “they just experience the world differently over there” like they’re aliens. I’m not making a 1-1 comparison but like, there ARE similarities!

                • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  I thought this article had some interesting insight into how living in Israel can distort someone’s perspective on these issues.

                  Meeting my friends in Israel this time, I frequently felt that they were afraid that I might disrupt their grief, and that living out of the country I could not grasp their pain, anxiety, bewilderment and helplessness. Any suggestion that living in the country had numbed them to the pain of others – the pain that, after all, was being inflicted in their name – only produced a wall of silence, a retreat into themselves, or a quick change of subject. The impression that I got was consistent: we have no room in our hearts, we have no room in our thoughts, we do not want to speak about or to be shown what our own soldiers, our children or grandchildren, our brothers and sisters, are doing right now in Gaza. We must focus on ourselves, on our trauma, fear and anger.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 hours ago

                    That’s how colonizers always are. Think about how much Afrikaners wailed and gnashed their teeth? Or French Algerians? Or, again, the white US South which construted a whole identity around being victims?

                    Settlers are settlers wherever they go. The decolonial struggle not only rehumanizes the colonized, it rehumanizes the colonizer as they are forced to recognize the pain and suffering of others. They still have to be defeated, regardless of their own whining.

                    That’s also why denazification is necessary - these people need to be forced to recognize the humanity of others or they’ll just migrate to Europe and America and be racist there.