• aranym@lemmy.nameOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As far as I know, they never claimed Lemmy was entirely self-hosted. Their intention was likely to say it can be, in which case decentralized would’ve been more clear…

    • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The original commenter said that “Lemmy is self-hosted”. This is what this comment thread was about. It sure is decentralized, not really self-hosted, even though you can host it youself.

      Edit: read another comment wrong

      • aranym@lemmy.nameOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m aware of the original comment. I also agree that Lemmy can’t be referred to as self hosted in the same way that Plex can, for example. I simply think they meant to say “can be” self hosted instead of “is”.

        • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just look at their comments. They full on say it’s a self-hosted platform no matter what, even though most people don’t host it and all of them don’t have to host it.