• Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    What the UAW is doing here is fighting for all workers. This sets precedents that ripple across all industries. What formed the UAW back in 1937 took some balls, and so does this.

    It’s not communism to fight for dignity and a living wage. We’re practically fighting for some more table scraps, but the rich are acting like we’re threatening social fabric.

    Go and get it Shawn, this is exactly what we all need right now. Support the UAW.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      In the last 20 years, we’ve seen the most rapid rise in productivity since the industrial revolution, and just like in the wake of the industrial revolution, there was massive worker exploitation that led to reforms and eventually unionization that ushered in a golden age of labor in America where workers were fairly compensated for the work they provided, so much so that it was easy for a salaryman to support a nuclear family on his single paycheck.

      Since then, the business owner class has been working hard to dismantle unions while refusing to pay their fair share of the massive profit windfalls to the bottom rung workers. We are long overdue for sweeping multi-industry unionization effort. Only then will we start seeing something more than just table scraps.

    • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fighting for dignity actually is literally communism. It’s capitalist propaganda that has you convinced otherwise.

      • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Communism provides a theoretical framework to advocate for those things, but it is not the same as doing those things. I think the distinction is important because it allows you to have a plurality or support

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wasn’t it that same episode where Rom basically says word for word that he doesn’t support unions because one day he might own Quark’s bar and then he’ll be able to oppress people too? What a great show, some people dislike the ferengi episodes but they’re some of my favorites in the series.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          People with the same mindset as Ferengi and who don’t like to be called out for their shit.

        • solstice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ikr? Some people hate 'em. They’re really goofy and cartoonish so I guess I get it. Profit and Lace is pretty tough to watch. The Magnificent Ferengi is my personal favorite (Iggy Pop guest stars too, what a treat!) And I quote the Rules of Acquisition in real life somewhat regularly, heh

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I vote for wrecking the rich’s yachts. There’s even a great capitalist reason to do it: the companies that build them might make new sales! Win-win!

    • clanginator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      When you think about it, at that point at least the rich are spending their money again in order to buy another yacht, actually putting money into the economy.

      It’s like trickle down economics, but we gotta shoot some holes in the water tower to make it trickle down.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is actually an example in The Wealth of Nations; Adam Smith considers whether a hooligan smashing a window is a benefit to society because it creates work for the glazier.

        Smith concluded that no, it isn’t a net benefit because the glazier could have made a new window instead.

        However, given that megayachts are net negative to society, I’m not sure how he’d view this case.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        When you think about it, at that point at least the rich are spending their money again in order to buy another yacht, actually putting money into the economy.

        People who think the rich just have vaults full of money are so fucking ridiculous.

        Poor people sit on cash. Poor people hide cash in their house. Almost the entirety of any rich person’s wealth is invested, because rich people generally pay smart people to handle their money.

        • Miqo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          “We were very wealthy,” says Errol Musk. “We had so much money at times we couldn’t even close our safe.”

          With one person holding the money in place, another other would slam the door.

          “And then there’d still be all these notes sticking out and we’d sort of pull them out and put them in our pockets.”

          You are willfully ignorant.

        • Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Poor people live paycheck to paycheck, 1 disaster away from bankruptcy and absolute poverty. What the actual fuck are you taking about??

  • notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    How does the working class not realise that the wealthy are the sodden bitch in a bog handing out the sword? Jeeebus

  • Transcriptionist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Image Transcription:

    X/Twitter post by user Teddy Ostrow @TeddyOstrow reading ‘“In their economy, workers live paycheck to paycheck while the billionaires buy another yacht… So we’re gonna wreck their economy cuz it only works for the billionaire class,” says @UAW prez Shawn Fain in Detroit.’

    Attached is an image of UAW president Shawn Fain speaking passionately at a targeted strike rally against the Detroit Big Three automakers (General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis).

    [I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even China knows this. Give the hard working people a better job than mom and dad had and they won’t rebel.

    The people who are rolling in their next billion have forgotten what happens when you take that away.

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are in the economic industrial boom that already happened to western countries decades ago. The problem is that eventually all booms end

      • Syldon@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That is just buying into accepting the current model where the rich can have it all at the expense of the poor. The model is the problem not the amount we have to distribute.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      China is about to find out as well, they have something like a 30% new-grad unemployment rate, and Pooh Bear is on a bootstraps kick saying that social protections encourage laziness.

      They’re on even thinner ice than the US.

      • DrPop@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean we all know what “didn’t” happen last time students got together in protest. Whatever became of the Hong Kong protest btw?

  • trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Controversial: how can illegal immigrants send money home but regular workers live paycheck to paycheck?

    Rent would be cheaper if renters would unionize and wouldn’t spend above an agreed on limit.

    It’s so hard to coordinate that only some workers can ask billionaires for better deals. Why? Why is not everybody ashamed that they cannot coordinate with their neighbors?

    Roman’s walked out of town once a year to remind the elite of their value. The west models itself after the Roman Republic but tries to skip on the hard parts.