Inspired by some of the discussion in this thread. I don’t think it’s appropriate place for that discussion there, but hey why not have a separate thread for it

If I think religion is not good in general, am I Reddit and cringe and basically Richard Dawkins?

  • vegeta1 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I have legit misgivings about religion but even I see how hawkish new atheists and their types are. Got dawkins cheer leading imperialistic actions and calling himself culturally Christian. How does one take it? Not to mention how phony the other so called horseman of atheism are. I mean look at this shit

    • That culturally Christian thing pisses me off so much, because it’s not even an unhelpful phrase in general, the problem is that he’s proud of it.

      I’ll fully acknowledge I am “culturally Christian,” but that is in no way a value judgement, just a factual observation that I grew up Christian and still celebrate Christmas and Easter and shit. In the same way someone is “culturally Jewish” if they celebrate the big Jewish holidays but don’t believe in god or go to temple.

      • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        But the thing is that you poke into “cultural Christianity” a little bit and it falls apart instantly, the same way that whiteness does.

        There’s very little tying some of the most Christian regions in the world together (like Poland, Italy, the Philippines, Latin America, the US, Russia, all very devout places in very different ways) except for some vague agreement on doctrine and dogma, and not even that.

        It’s always a shorthand for western, european imperialism, because sure as hell they’re not thinking about Egyptian coptic Christians when they’re identifying with “cultural Christianity”

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sam Harris is a cult leader, a quack, and a fraud, and yet so many “rational” and “logical” New Atheists still believe he’s an authority on anything when even his doctorate came from a phony foundation financed by his family that was made specifically to give him that doctorate then dissipated. The fucking quack doesn’t even do any peer-reviewed papers!

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Sam Harris also had some exceptionally clownish takes, such as the claim that “there is more scientific progress in a single New York zip code than in all the history of Islam.”

          How does one even measure scientific progress in a zip code compared to the history of an entire religion and all its associated sociopolitical connections across many lands, especially one that came up with Algebra (it’s in the name!) and chemistry (started under Al-chemy!) and arabic numerals which we’re using on this site right now?

          That’s just it: you can’t. It’s not even compatible measurements! Even if they were, it’s fucking wrong.

          • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Hilariously Sam Harris writes books on meditation now, joined the McMindfulness camp. Its even impossible to criticism him on /r/buddhism without western-supremacists jumping down your throat.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              White Buddhism is the fucking worst, or at least it would be if it weren’t for techbros coming up with what they call, I kid you not, “Dark Buddhism” which is even worse than that. agony-4horsemen

          • vegeta1 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I also notice how a lot of atheist online who are noticeably quiet about the famous atheists who do convert to Christianity like Russell brand or ayan hrsi especially when they cosign far right rhethoric . It definitely would be a hell of a lot louder if one of em converted to islam

          • And even if it was true, you have to be some kind of unique techno bro piece of shit to want to quantify the value of a people’s lives through technological discovery. Like, your culture is only worth something if it produces le science, not because it has a right to exist and thrive by virtue of existing. Might as well get rid of all art that’s not bazinga sci-fi marvel slop to make you go awooga

            The whole other thread about China had me thinking about this all day. How fucking slimy do you have to be to say “the Chinese people would be worth so much more if they invented more gadgets”

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              The whole other thread about China had me thinking about this all day. How fucking slimy do you have to be to say “the Chinese people would be worth so much more if they invented more gadgets”

              I missed that thread. What the fuck was the take maker saying exactly?

              • https://hexbear.net/post/3801944?scrollToComments=false

                The person we were dunking on was lamenting the “wasted potential” of le science Chinese people would’ve discovered if only they were a liberal democracy.

                This rubbed me all sorts of wrong of course, but mostly because this person can only understand a people’s value by amount of technology, like if people don’t spend every waking moment being epic scientists they’re a waste of space, and that all knowledge that’s doesn’t fit this person’s view of development is worthless.

                • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  Think of the advancements and innovations

                  So many lost opportunities to churn out additional plastic trash! China’s actual scientific achievements after the revolution don’t count because reasons! porky-scared

                  Free-thinking, questioning, exploring souls

                  The only acceptable mindset is to be an insufferably selfish western-style treat brain! porky-scared

                  You weren’t kidding. Fuck that asshole.

                  • It’s just so… inhuman. When I think about the wasted potential (even if I’m a bit uncomfortable with the phrase) because of capitalism and genocide and dispossession, I don’t think that we’ve been deprived of flying cars or nuclear fusion or whatever; I think about how many people could’ve been happier in a different world, how many families could’ve loved each other for longer and better, how many celebrations and expressions of the human condition could be out there, how much we’re missing out on the feeling of basic human dignity because we’re ground into paste by an uncaring, poisonous system.

                    I get really suspicious, and really sad, when someone demonstrates all they care about is technology, leaving any other part of being human to the side.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Might as well get rid of all art that’s not bazinga sci-fi marvel slop to make you go awooga

              Early in the LLM treat printer hype wave era, one of the hottest takes I had ever seen was exactly that: that art shouldn’t really exist unless it’s optimized for maximum enjoyment for the maximum number of people, which the treat printers could objectively provide, no further “not real job” artists required.

              You know, utter fucking slop pandering to hogs.

              Utilitarianism can be a fuck.

              https://existentialcomics.com/comic/426