tombruzzo@lemm.ee to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 10 months agoIs there a lore reason why American elections are so convoluted?message-squaremessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareIs there a lore reason why American elections are so convoluted?tombruzzo@lemm.ee to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square3fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareemizeko [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months ago In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of the landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place. If these observations be just, our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation. Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority. The senate, therefore, ought to be this body; and to answer these purposes, they ought to have permanency and stability. —James Madison
minus-squareallthetimesivedied [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoShocker there what “tyranny of the majority” actually meant.
minus-squareSacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-210 months agoYeah, it makes much more sense when taken in the context of them all being wealthy landowners, many of whom owned slaves
—James Madison
Shocker there what “tyranny of the majority” actually meant.
Yeah, it makes much more sense when taken in the context of them all being wealthy landowners, many of whom owned slaves