Why YSK: The term “Genuine Leather” is a marketing term to sell the lowest quality leather possible.

When purchasing a leather product, look for full grain leather or top grain leather instead. These will provide a much higher quality cut of leather that will look and feel much better and last for much longer.

  • PreMalone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This really is a perfect replacement for reddit, we even have the same reposted fun facts

    • washabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, reposting things that were on Reddit before would be a good way to get more content on here

        • Givesomefucks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reddit does it with Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Tumblr…

          Some of the bigger communities is literally just screenshots of what people say other places.

          It would be pretty funny to see an instance that just pulls posts from subs and posts them to Lemmy. Not direct links to reddit, just copy the link/pic/video

          • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            fair point… yeah now that you mention it, a lot of the shit I used to see on reddit was from “curated tumbler”, " white people twitter" etc…

            I’m glad I left reddit, the api cluster fuck and associated protests (which I joined w/ my rinky dink tiny sub) came at the perfect time to give me the shove out the door I needed. I was spending 3, 4, 5 hours of my day reading the most inane bullshit.

            I’m at extremely high risk of it happening again with lemmy, but I like to think it’ll never take on the endlessly churning sewer-exit pipe amount of “content” that reddit had with its however many millions of users.

    • Pisck@lemmy.world@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      next YSK: /c/YouShouldKnow reposts things from /r/youshouldknow

      top comment: /r/youshouldknow is also reposts from /r/youshouldknow reply–> the real YSK is in the comments

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not quite. The truth is, there is no universally recognized grades of leather. But when bragging about quality, genuine leather is the lowest bar they can go (other than bonded leather, which isn’t fully leather but just a veneer over fabric.

    Full grain or top grain is generally what you want.

    https://lifehacker.com/what-genuine-leather-really-means-1850309049

    Also, some are concerned about the use of an animal product. The vast majority of leather is a byproduct of the beef industry. It is skin that would otherwise go to waste. And it is also far more environmentally friendly a material than many alternatives, which are often made of plastics.

    • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, honestly you should buy leather products based on brands than on description of “genuine” leather.

      And agree, real leather is a much better alternative to the ridiculous amount of micro-plastic synthetic leather generates, especially since it’ll last you decades if you maintain it well.

    • queermunist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the industry recapturing some of its costs by reducing waste. That’s still supporting the industry.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We applauded Native Americans for using every part of the animal, yet when we do it today somehow it’s a bad thing.

        The skins are there rather you like the industry or not. Better to use them than throw them in a landfill.

        • queermunist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          By your logic, why don’t we flay off the skins of all dead people and wear those too? They’re just going to waste!

          I’m opposed to the animal killing industry and all of its various outgrowths. The less money that can be made from it, the less money will be invested into the industry in the first place. If the skins end up in a landfill, that’s lost revenue that makes the industry suffer. Putting money in the pockets of these businesses just lets them reinvest. Stop trying to portray your choice to wear skin as somehow the more ethical one and preach from some imaginary moral high ground.

            • queermunist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Tan me hide when I’m dead, Fred
              Tan me hide when I’m dead
              So we tanned his hide when he died, Clyde
              And that’s it hangin’ on the shed!
              Altogether now!

              (actually, I unironically think human remains should be reused instead of preserved in a box lol)

          • imagoodmushroom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d genuinely prefer if my family turned my remains into a fucking backpack instead of paying thousands of dollars to put them on a cushioned box in the ground

          • why don’t we flay off the skins of all dead people and wear those too?

            Because human skin makes really shitty quality leather. It’s not nearly thick enough.

            Human bodies aren’t even fit for composting, given the amount of pharmaceuticals and forever chemicals most have in their bodies by the time they die.

          • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Relax, no need to name-call. Otherwise, I’ll be forced to make a video of me badly singing “Imagine”, and nobody wants to hear that.

            • queermunist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Name call? Did I slip up and call someone a bloodmouth or something?

              I don’t think I called anyone any names, I just pointed out the fact that this reverse “gatcha” where people pretend like wearing leather is actually the more ethical choice is ridiculous. I have more respect for unapologetic leather wearers, at least they aren’t lying to themselves.

              • Gatsby@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hahahahahahahahaha did you just call him a bloodmouth? Are you a fuckin villager in the 1600s fuckin blood mouth

                • queermunist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s what carnists are! They eat things that bleed. Hence, bloodmouth.

                  Corpse sucker is also fun.

          • debased@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            gotta love all the people throwing shade at you but never showing any actual counterargument. Average carnist behaviour, gotta keep the cognitive dissonance at bay.

            • queermunist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Don’t you see? By not draping ourselves in the flesh of dead animals we’re actually being disrespectful of their sacrifices!!! You don’t want animals to end up in landfills, do you?

              Bleh. There’s nothing worse than these preachy types who try to assuage their guilt by presenting their practices as ethical. At least carnists that don’t care about animals are honest with themselves

  • SweetSitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should also know that technically only the piece marked as genuine leather needs to actually be genuine leather. If you buy something made with multiple pieces, the rest could be made from any material so long as that one piece is genuine.

      • CountZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know what’s cool about “natural flavors”? They just have to be found in nature to call them that. They can be synthesized in a lab and still be a “natural flavor.”

        P.S. don’t fall for the naturalistic fallacy. This comment is about tricky vocabulary used by the food industry. Whether or not a chemical is found in nature has nothing to do with whether it is good or bad for you. Arsenic is natural.

        • ShadyGrove@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup! “All Natural” is just a marketing term, there’s no regulations behind it. USDA Organic is a real thing though, farms need to be organic for 7 years to be labeled that, if I recall correctly at least

        • RedClouds@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay so I did debate on whether to use that example, because yeah I’m a skeptic and don’t fall for the naturalistic fallacy. But it just happens to be a good example. Such a silly thing, made of “natural” and/or “unnatural” ingredients covers 100% of things lol.

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a reason why American cheese is called a “pasteurized prepared cheese product”, using various terms in food is heavily regulated.

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can somebody explain why leather is better? It’s it the smell? The feel? Tradition? I see it in car reviews where they complain about cloth.

    • Sentiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s breathable but works in both warm and cold weather. This makes it ideal for spring and autumn. It’s easy to clean although it’s also hard to maintain (you have to oil it and protect it against rain). It lasts for very long if you care for it unlike fabric or fake leather, so a leather jacket can be worn for decades and still look and feel great.

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surely leather is skin and skin is very definitely non porous? Secrete oils from tiny glands? Yes. Let water through? Very much nope.

        • Sentiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s various types of leather, some of which are actually porous. I’m no expert but you can Google it.

          The point about rain protection isn’t related to the water getting through but because rain can contain chemicals and salt which can stain the leather and also make the leather brittle and vulnerable to mechanical damage, like getting cracks on it because it loses some of it’s natural elasticity.

          This is usually prevented by oiling it and putting various rain protection products on it.

    • YuzuDrink@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      My best guess (not in the community or anything) is that leather does better at being durable—especially if you treat it well and condition it regularly?—than cloth and plastic-leather alternatives, which break down. I know leather is meant to be very durable and have good “properties,” but I can’t be specific.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve had a leather belt for about 25 years now, wear it multiple times a week. In all those years I’ve gone through multiple other belts that haven’t lasted.

        Far as I see it, leather belts are the most economical and better for the environment than constantly manufacturing lesser lasting belts.

        • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s been designed by time. Why manufacture something that has been provided? Seems like an unnecessary step, and a large reason for much of our problems. My s.o. works leather as a hobby, and it’s really cool. All the stuff she’s made me is better than anything I’ve had before.

        • wotsit_sandwich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bought a leather belt in Prague as a nice souvenir. Stil wearing it almost daily over 20 years later. I replaced the stitching but the leather is still rock solid.

    • kcdaguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is something people think they want because it is more expensive and in higher trim levels in cars. But when your car is parked in the hot sun the leather feels like it burns and in the winter is freezing to the touch. Leather also doesn’t breath so you end up sweating more and if your are not wearing long pants your leg will stick to the seat. Cloth is so much better functionally. Cloth also lasts longer than the fake leather they put in cars. Cloth won’t peel like the fake leather.

      • BubblyMango
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any cloth i have seen in cars absorbs my swet, and is hard to clean up afterwards, unlike leather.

    • decadentrebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like how leather feels like and the unique look when it’s aged or beaten up. Works great with wallets, belts, shoes… but not so much your couch, especially when it’s hot and humid.

    • Ronno@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @BigTrout75 many people are sensitive to dust. A car with a leather interior is easier to clean. The dust cannot stick in the seats.

      • okiloki@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s be honest here. The amount of people this applies to is miniscule.

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t house dust mainly skin and leather also skin? Admittedly leather is dead skin that’s not being replaced any more, so perhaps without a process of replacement it also somehow lacks the shedding?

    • RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mostly people like it because it’s expensive and it makes them feel rich. It is more durable than cloth but that hardly matters for most of the things it’s used for.

      • darcy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is very useful for furniture and car seats and things like that. Waterproof and easy to maintain without absorbing too much scents or liquids from your body.

      • RedClouds@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hardly matters? Try having kids and a dog for 5 years with a cloth couch. The permanent stains and smell will be impossible to get out.

        Real leather? Will hold up to everything and go for 10 more years.

        Garbage leather? Will crack and tear the first time your dog gets on it.

        Leather has issues (Ethical issues with how we treat cows. Elitists issues putting leather on every surface of their car whether it needs it or not, etc). But quality leather matters, and does make a difference in durability.

        • RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dunno, we have had a non leather sofa in my family home for like over 5 years and it’s fine. Nothing wrong with it to me.

  • wvenable@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you think about it, it makes sense. All they are saying it’s that is actually real leather which is the least you could say about leather.

    To add to the naming fun: Corinthian Leather.

  • Arete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought “genuine” was the middle grade, with “bonded” being the lowest. Bob’s Furniture used to market “genuine bonded leather” sofas which I found both clever and infuriating.

    • BlueDepth9279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bonded leather is less than 20% real leather and made from scraps and fibers of genuine leather combined with binders. It’s generally not as durable as genuine leather.

  • niktemadur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    In one of those 70s Fat Albert episodes, I think it was Rudy who one day showed up wearing a jacket of “genuine imitation leather”. That term has stuck with me for decades.

  • c4@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I can say is that it’s still at least leather. Most things (e.x., belts) will say “manmade leather” or “manmade materials” and they are fake and break. The genuine leather belt I have has been working for 4 years without snapping.

    • Solo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Still better to get full grain leather. Guinie leather is to full grain leather as particle board is to solid wood.

      • FooSolo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So genuine leather is made of nutsacks, udders, and assholes pressed together with a veneer piece of taint stretched over it to make it look like full grain leather.

    • lich_hegemon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has its place.

      For example, leather in second hand products it’s great because it’s durable and often high quality. And, whatever you do, the animal has already been killed and paid for.

      I would also buy leather products if it’s for something that I intend to use for many years. It sort of offsets the environmental damage from buying multiple synthetic products.

      Then again, I’m not vegan.

    • mitchie151@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the right context, leather goods are much more durable and sustainable than synthetic alternatives. That said, leather is a co-product of the meat and dairy industry which is currently ridiculously unsustainable. Leather for leathers sake in designer goods and such is ridiculous.

    • Solo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. I don’t purchase leather anymore but when I did I still knew genuine leather is pretty much junk.

    • corporateHippie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wonder what the people who are downvoting this are thinking. Is it not murder, or is it only a restproduct of murder?

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        70
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s because it’s irrelevant for someone who would be interested in leather (and this YSK). I’m sure they’re well aware of where leather comes from. I will say, though, that if cows are getting murdered for food, then they might as well use the whole animal instead of letting it go to waste.

      • unsophisticated@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder what people who upvote this are thinking, obviously the point is moot unless you are also vegan. And who upvotes someone going “meat is murder” in the comment section.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not vegan, but I do personally agree that it’s selfish and inhumane to eat meat and use leather - especially on an industrial scale. I eat meat, but I don’t have any delusions about where it comes from.

          Not meaning to argue, but just to say it’s not only vegans that think about this stuff. Also, even if it was, that doesn’t mean they’re wrong or moot.

          • TheSaneWriter@vlemmy.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s the difference between vegan ethics and being a vegan in practice. I generally agree with vegan ethics, I think that meat and leather are generally made from murder. Perhaps a lesser version of murder than killing a human being, but murder nonetheless. However, animal products are common in both food and consumer goods and I don’t have the time or money to commit towards fully avoiding them. Like with the issue of many of our agricultural goods being the product of slavery, I believe that this is something that should moreso be curtailed by the state than any individual consumer.

            • kakes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is my general philosophy. I try to be as ethical as I can, but I realize there will always be a certain level of “hypocrisy” in my actions.

      • Dfc09@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like to think myself open-minded, but I’m also a meat eater. It really is just a matter of self control and convenience. I know humans eating meat in most developed countries is completely unnecessary. I know farming methods are cruel and environmentally damaging. It’s just tough to shake off the habit of craving a nice chicken breast or steak, especially since I lean towards a very high protein a diet.

        I’d go far enough to say it used to not be murder, but now we only kill animals for luxury.

        • CrimeDad@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s fine, but if you’re going to advocate for an alternative product, you should believe in it enough not to pretend it’s the thing it’s supposed to replace or that the people you’re trying to convince are too stupid to notice the difference.

        • average650@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you enjoy it great.

          Except for a few specific cases, indo not enjoy them at all… Oat milk is okay if the milk is not a major player in taste. Coconut milk is good if you want a coconutty taste.

          • MrAegis@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally I prefer soymilk and almond milk for cereal, but I’ll stick to regular milk products for most sauces/cooking.