• Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    you are delusional.

    I watched your silly video.

    do you also not believe in the fraudulent electors scheme that has been documented and happened and people have been convicted for?

    do you not believe in the call Trump made to Georgia to try to literally create votes out of nothing?

    you can post baseless YouTube videos all you want, they don’t contradict the facts.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I watched your silly video.

      When? In the one minute it took you to reply to me posting it? /s

      Have fun in your world of conspiracies.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I’ve seen that trash several times now

        mega heads have been posting it.

        have fun making things up.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          have fun making things up.

          Says the person whose primary source pretty much only writes in conditionals and calls them “facts”.

          If you watched it so often, why don’t you address her points, then?

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            I literally addressed her points in the other comment.

            which part confused you?

            she basically agrees with me.

            the guy was right before in 2004, we know that Republicans do steal elections and try to steal one 4 years ago, so we should do recounts this time.

            you didn’t watch her video did you?

            you just went along with the headline.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I literally addressed her points in the other comment.

              You didn’t at the time I wrote the other comment. Again: wtf are you trying to pull off, lying and shit?

              she basically agrees with me. the guy was right before 2000, we know that Republicans do steal elections and try to steal one 4 years ago, so we should do recounts this time.

              No, she doesn’t. He didn’t claim anything like that in 2000. From the transcript:

              Need I go on? This “lifelong Republican,” (as he stated in his letter to Kamala Harris) has previously campaigned to reverse the 2004 election in which George W. Bush beat John Kerry–the year Bush won even the popular vote, by the way, not the year he actually stole the election in Florida.

              you didn’t watch her video did you?

              First, you call her right wing, then you claim that she’s lying, then you claim that she agrees with you by misquoting her. Pathetic.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                yeah dude, i didn’t answer you before you asked a question.

                do you understand how questions work?

                go ahead. keep making stuff up, anyone can scroll up.

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  yeah dude, i didn’t answer you before you asked a question.

                  1. I am not your dude. Don’t call me that.
                  2. “I literally addresses that” implies that I ignored your other comment… before it existed…
                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    1.you’re being so informal and dude-ish with me, though.

                    1. do you think you win arguments by running down tangents and just ignoring all the facts or relevant topics?

                    haha, because I’ll tell you, that’s not how you do it.

                    again the facts:

                    4 years ago, Trump and his team perpetrated the fake electors game and try to steal the election.

                    2 years after that, we had proof that they stole voting software.

                    now, many security experts are telling us that because of that stolen software and the fake electro scheme, we should manually count the votes in the states that determined the presidential election because they easily could have been manipulated or fabricated.

                    you don’t like this one other scientist guy.

                    fine, write him a me and letter where you make stuff up about him.

                    but all that other stuff is real and all those other computer scientists?

                    also real, whether you like it or not.