In short, results were positive, but how can we be sure that they’re not really negative, and as such we recommend against proceeding with a 4-day work week.

The wording makes it easy to keep it at 40hr workweeks with 4x10s. They did mention reduced hours without a pay cut, so I’ll infer they meant 32hr workweeks.

It needs to be worded as 32hr workweeks otherwise dummies will jump on the 4x10 train.

Regardless, 32hr workweeks as a standard will never happen in he US, at least not any time soon. I wouldn’t be surprised if we raised it to 50.