• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    LOL, “debate”.

    The qons do whatever the hell they want, and dare anyone to push back. If anyone even clears their throat, the right cries about being “cancelled” or whatever.

  • Roopappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    We want to elect a president who is a convicted fraudster, found to have committed a sexual assault, who incited people to overthrow the government and murder is VP then watched excitedly while it went down, and who has promised to suspend our rights to punish anyone who questions him…

    And then, we want to talk about presidential ethics?

    Yeah, no. That ship has sailed. Ethics will get much much worse, because that’s what voters clearly selected. Lets not pretend anyone gives a shit.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, Biden made a bad decision

    However

    Trump pardoned all his friends and heavy criminals before, nobody gave a damn. He said he’d pardon all those in the January 6 coup , and he would pardon himself.

    Biden did the right thing, not only for his family, because of course, but also to start this debate. Hopefully we can stop presidential pardons before trump gets in. Not that it will matter, trump will just do whatever the fuck he wants

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure getting rid of presidential pardons is right either. There are cases of provably innocent people on death row who have been saved from execution by presidential pardon because the justice system otherwise failed them. It’s not a perfect system, and it has failed more than it has saved, but until we reform the justice system (and probably ban the death penalty) stopping presidential pardons is a terrible idea.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If innocent people in jail is a problems then pardons are NOT the solution.

        Fix the damn broken justice system. A fair justice system doesn’t have as it’s main goal to jail criminals, it has as its main goal to keep the innocent out.

        Better have a few criminals who unjustly stay out of jail than having a few innocents in jail

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    As soon as a democrat does it, everyone suddenly cares? We should do this more often, clearly the magats need to see an example before they’ll agree to fix the loopholes.

    • Vipsu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s easy to expect perfection from your opponents while crying about whataboutism when someone points out their side has done the same.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Trump: Filling his cabinet with conflicted individuals and loyalists, many of whom have had legal troubles and been pardoned by him.

    Biden: Pardons a family member who has never held government office for a drug-related offence.

    And which story dominates the news cycle? The media is more than complicit in the resurgence of fascism in this country.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe I’m being inflammatory, but I think this move might have saved his son’s life. I wouldn’t be surprised if the next administration was planning to make an example of Hunter to show off their newly radicalized DOJ

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Agree, due to the politization of the case, its no longer about legality or justice. Its a safety issue now, I dont feel like this is an ethical pardon, but the country voted against ethics, so im not going to be mad at this.

        If Harris had won then it would have been a very different matter, but the upcoming DOJ apointees will likely be 47s attack dogs and the biden family cant afford have any lingering cases for them to exploit.

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thing that’s been dominating the news cycle for weeks is momentarily less dominant than thing that happened just yesterday.

      Must be because people are so unfair to that troubled youth who just needed help, Hunter Biden. Has nothing to do with Joe Biden promising to use presidential powers to pardon the indigent, disproportionately-black group of people who went to jail for possessing weed and instead using the powers specifically for his 54 year old millionaire son.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Biden already pardoned everyone convicted of possessing weed. The only “non-violent” cannabis offenders in federal prison are dealers.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        LOL, like any of these papers give a fuck about pardoning weed prisoners. You’re right that he should be pardoning more people, but the “debate” and “controversy” is entirely separate from that.

        • BMTea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          These papers care about him promising not to do it then doing it anyways - that’s also part of the controversy.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            A promise about an irrelevant thing is similarly irrelevant. This isn’t pushing the bounds for presidential pardons or going to influence the future of politics or law enforcement at all. The media is deeply concerned about a trivial act that’s both 100x less serious than the lies and pardons of his predecessor, those of past Democratic presidents, and his own prior deceptions and actions. It’s centrist media clutching pearls for the precious “norms” and “optics” while everyone knows Trump has and will do worse in this very same department and that Biden himself has grave failures they’re completely uninterested in. They want to pretend they’re hard-nosed watchdogs of Both Sides without actually engaging in any truth-seeking that might upset people who will still hold power past January.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wow, this reads with so much hatred that it took me a few times to recognize the sarcasm. It’s not even nuanced, it’s just so angry-sounding and seemingly hate-filled that my emotions were louder than the actual words.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      If a nazi uses the n word…

      No one is surprised.

      When your only other option also uses it, that doesn’t make it ok because they didn’t mean to say it in public intentionally.

      When you settle for “a slip” and say that’s ok, the only thing you’re doing is making it easier for people to act like the nazi isn’t that bad. Because you’ve normalized it

      If Biden wants to “take the low road” then fucking take it and do some good for the American people. Don’t do it only for purely selfish reasons.

      That is why people are upset with Biden about this

      It’s like saying it’s ok to steal food for your starving family to justify stealing, then you just eat all the food yourself.

      There’s a lot Biden can do to help Americans still, he just doesn’t give a fuck.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t care about this pardon because it’s a crime around bullshit that affects nobody, and has only gone the way it has due to political nonsense. The vast majority of drug offenses are similar.

        I disagree with Trump’s pardons because he has literally surrounded himself with career criminals, asked them to do criminal things, and pardoned them when they got in trouble for it.

        Only one of these two is institutionalized corruption.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sounds like a trump supporter arguing gun laws need revoked…

          Like, you realize he wasn’t charged for smoking crack.

          He had charges for buying a gun while on crack, trying to throw it away by a school. And then it not being there when going back to get it.

          The vast majority of drug offenses are similar.

          The vast amount of cannabis probably. But not Crackheads.

          Do you honestly believe habitual crack use that results in multiple trips to rehab isn’t a reason for someone to not be able to possess a gun?

          I honestly wouldn’t be surprised, just holding out hope for the party for some stupid reason.

          What I’ve been seeing today tho, Dems have gone full trump and will excuse anything and always say they’re party had a reason for personal corruption and not helping the public

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a fair criticism of Biden, but Biden wasn’t being criticized by that comment, rather the media coverage was. The media has consistently shrugged their shoulders and acted like nothing was wrong as Trump time and time again utterly violates both conventions and laws, but the moment anyone not in the MAGA-sphere puts even a toe out of line it’s treated as a huge scandal. Should Joe have pardoned Hunter? No it undermines the entire message of nobody is above the law, but at the same time it’s such a trivial thing in the face of the absolute and complete disregard of both morals and laws shown by Trump and his team daily.

        In the face of such blatant double standards the media’s rush to clutch their pearls in this case just rings as exceptionally hollow.

        • QuincyPeck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I disagree that he shouldn’t have pardoned Hunter. Hunter went through the legal system with no advantages, reached a plea deal that was perfectly normal for any regular citizen, only to have Republicans blow it up to have something to beat Joe over the head with. Hunter has paid his late taxes with fines. The only remaining issue was him lying on his form about being on drugs while buying a gun. They were going to throw him under the prison for that dumb shit.

          But yeah, Joe needs to go on a pardon spree. Trump established that new norm last time.

        • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Should Joe have pardoned Hunter? No it undermines the entire message of nobody is above the law

          I disagree. Hunter’s prosecution was political in nature. Anyone else accused of the same crimes would not have faced even close to what he did. If it were anyone else I would still want Biden to pardon him.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is very much not a trending story in the media because they want more pardons or more extreme action. It may be why you’re upset, but you’re interjecting yourself in an entirely less ideological fabricated controversy. It’s a “tsk, tsk, the norms” response.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I am honestly completely indifferent to Biden pardoning Hunter. My beef is with the media. This impacts the life of 1 person: Hunter Biden. They’re giving it wall to wall coverage because it’s drama and they’re reality TV calling themselves journalists.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          My beef is with the media. This impacts the life of 1 person: Hunter Biden

          My beef is with Biden, because even if the only thing he can do is pardon people, Hunter ain’t the only one trump will go after

          You telling me Hunter needs protected more than Fauci?

          Even if so, why isn’t Biden pardoning the other people as well

          The issue is Biden isn’t doing more, same issue as the last four years

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        All that Americans have left, on both sides I might add, is the desire to see the other side suffer. Republicans have been doing this for a while. The Trump presidency will disenfranchise the Democrats to the same level, evening the playing field.

        This is where America is at now. Just angry people with nothing left but to hurt some scapegoats.

        The only question is is this a race to the bottom (bottom being a civil war killing millions), or will the public wake the fuck up?

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          on both sides

          Really? What Democratic politicians are setting out to try to harm people? And what specific policies?

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          People really just want their team to hurt or piss off the other side.

          It really ain’t gonna be long till both sides are firmly “us/them” and the rich will keep making the poor’s fight each other.

          It’s fucking embarrassing

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is what does it? I’m not a fan of the nepotism, but there were plenty of worse cases that should’ve renewed the debate. Doesn’t give me much hope for whatever comes out of this “debate”.

  • DoomHorizons@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The time to worry about the limits of presidential power was during the supreme court decision on immunity

    Now that cats out of the bag, there’s no sense in Biden trying to adhere to standards that no longer exist

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yup. Let him go crazy with those powers. As sour as it tastes, he was given authority to do so by the Federal Supreme Court. If MAGA doesn’t like it they can kiss our collective asses and roll that shit back.

      They won’t, of course, for a couple reasons:

      1. It IS another form of power
      2. They know the left will have plenty of people complaining whenever someone on their side decides to use it, while everyone on the Far Right will rejoice.

      I suggest those of you whining about this take a step back and look at the bigger issues. One of which happens to be rather rotund, orange, and requires us to stop bickering.

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      You argument is quite literally “the president should just go ahead and misuse power right now because it was abused before.” It’s astonishing what you people will let Dems get away with and how little you consider the damage it does to the party’s image, chances, conduct and culture.

      • DoomHorizons@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The damage is already done, why worry about image, chances conduct and culture in a country that’s got no future either way

        He might as well do what he can while he can, none of it is going to matter for long

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Sooo…

      Why’d he just pardon his own son?

      Why isn’t he trying to fix this broken law rather than just pardoning his own son who’s in his 50s?

      Like, if the gloves are off shouldn’t Biden be doing a bunch of stuff to help a lot of people at once?

      He’s fine with his son breaking this gun law for crack, but won’t de-regulate cannabis so Americans in states where it’s legal won’t be breaking the law by owning a gun?

      Drunks and (some special) crackheads can have guns but somebody who smokes a little green at night instead of a beer can’t own a gun?

      Edit:

      After four years of political experts outling actions he can take…

      It’s really fucking depressing some people honestly believe this is all he can do

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        The president cannot create laws or change the constitution themselves. That’s what the legislative branch does.

        • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, but what if Biden makes it an “official act” to abolish Congress and usurp the ability to make law? It’s clearly illegal, but POTUS cannot be held to account so nobody can stop him… right?

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why isn’t he trying to fix this broken law rather than just pardoning his own son who’s in his 50s?

        Do you not understand what powers the President is given? Executive orders can only do so much, and it’s irrelevant when the next administration can simply undo them in a month.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Let’s say all he can do is pardon people to save them from trump…

          You telling me the only person trump is/was going after is Hunter?

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The President doesn’t make laws, Congress does. You need to be talking to your representative and Senators and holding them accountable.

        About cannabis specifically, he already pardoned the federal non-violent, non-distribution offenders. And his DOJ has recommended the DEA reschedule it to a Class III drug, they’re the department that actually controls drug scheduling.

        State drug laws are not something the President has control of. Again that you be your State reps.

        You seem to either not understand how this works or are purposely ignoring that for whatever reason.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          About cannabis specifically, he already pardoned the federal non-violent, non-distribution offenders. And his DOJ has recommended the DEA reschedule it to a Class III drug, they’re the department that actually controls drug scheduling.

          He pardoned some.

          He can order agencies to do things and replace them if they refuse.

          But even if the only thing he can do is pardon people to save them from trump…

          Why is he only pardoning his son who admitted guilt to his crimes already?

          Do you and Biden both think Hunter is the only one at risk and the only one that need protection from trump?

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Why do you think that Trump is going to give any shit about whether someone has been pardoned already? What in his history makes you think he will follow the law?

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              So you’re happy Biden did this…

              But it means absolutely nothing…

              Why do you think he did it anyways?

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t honestly care about it that much. Biden is correct that these specific specific charges are rarely brought to court, and if Hunter were anyone else, they wouldn’t have been. There WAS political interference by the Republicans ONLY because it was Biden’s son, he was targeted for political reasons, not because of the laws he broke.

                The pardon power SHOULD be used in situations of injustice. Individuals being targeted because of who they are related to, race, gender, identity, etc. instead of the merits of the charges themselves. Or where extenuating circumstances provide a lot more context. Law enforcement has a lot of leeway with determining when to arrest and prosecute, and jury nullification exists for context situations at the peer level already. Laws are written by man, and many laws on the books are unjust, some by design. There are situations where something illegal probably shouldn’t be, or the context surrounding it needs to be considered. Sometimes the end does justify the means. Government whistleblowers being targeted for instance.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  There WAS political interference by the Republicans ONLY because it was Biden’s son, he was targeted for political reasons, not because of the laws he broke.

                  What republicans?

                  The ones Biden appointed?

                  Otherwise I don’t see how they were capable of doing things the last four years…

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Fucking good. The pardon power is bullshit and we ought to pull it the fuck out of the constitution. I’m glad Brandon pardoned his son, though, I hope republicans go apoplectic. Those cunts ushered in this era of lawlessness, why the fuck should we play ball? Sort out your twice-impeached rapist felon traitor president, cunts. Don’t step to me with this Hunter Biden bullshit. Fuck off and die.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, Biden should just go completely off the rails, and do all the shit Trump is threatening to do, including jailing political rivals. Including the red members of the SCOTUS. Give them plenty of warning, and plenty of time to reverse their prior ruling, but start following through if they decline to. Make them respond.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        Too bad the Democrats official motto is “when they go low, we sit here and do absofucukinglutly nothing but cry about it and let them tread all over us.”

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I said months ago that Biden and the larger Democratic party needed to come out swinging. I doubled down after Biden’s lackluster debate. When Harris hit the ground sprinting I was actually happy. Then some traditional democratic strategic asshat convinced her to simmer down and take a risky route that would only have worked 25 years ago.

        Step up, Dems. We’ve gone from cushy NFL offsides to NFL Blitz and you’re waaay behind.

  • treefrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump is going to pardon much worse criminals than Hunter. And the GOP won’t say shit.

    Hypocrites are going to do what they want. So what debate?

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh my god, Biden did something vaguely questionable, clutch my fucking pearls.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      vague questionable on a case that was questionable. I still think of how clintons impeachment was due to a lie about a relationship with lewinski in the watergate investigation which they were cleared for but they still impeached due to the lie about the questionable personal relationship and then not having even that for biden they went after his son who at most used his name to make money. But trump was impeached because of withholding money to a foreign leader until they managed to pressure their press to give him a line of attack on his opponent. And the dems never impeached bush or reagan. sad.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I know this is a questionable move, but with a gang of fascist crooks about to take over the USA it’s a bit depressing to read headlines that are still stuck at “renews ethical debate”. Fascists don’t debate ethics or anything else, and particularly fascist autocrats and their enablers don’t debate the ethical limits of presidential power. They have other ways of resolving matters, and people need to focus on preparing effective ways to defend themselves.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is no “ethical debate” anymore. You’re system is broken to the core and I don’t blame Biden at all for saying “fuck it”.

    Hell, if I were him I’d use my so-called “Presidential Immunity” to do whatever he can to fuck up the MAGA agenda before he leaves.

    “I’m putting 6 new judges on the supreme court, all democract. Why? Because fuck you, that’s why.”

    “I’m giving two of our nukes because fuck Putin”

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m hoping that this is just a start and won’t be a single action. I can unfortunately see the side of everyone’s opinion on this, good and bad, which is why it needs to be today’s headline only because Trump hasn’t put some other loyalist in a position today yet.