• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To blame capitalism for the lack of a Star Trek future is to fundamentally misunderstand why capitalism is the way it is.

    Capitalism isn’t some evil calamity that fell from the sky. Human beings created it. No matter what system you make, we will inevitably corrupt it so long as selfishness and greed are hardwired into our primate brains. Communism, socialism, capitalism, whatever. They all need hard rules to work because humans will turn any system into a way to enrich themselves, and given time, they will even erode the rules to do it.

    For every extraordinary bit of technology or otherworldly space entity or reality shattering cosmic event to ever show up in Star Trek, the single most unbelievable thing about it is the notion that the human race could ever, collectively, and permanently forego their selfish instincts. Its a society that only works if the human race changes itself on a fundamental, evolutionary level, and does so in unison. Because as long as any human feels a desire for more than they have, or the desire to protect what they do have, we’ll never achieve that.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      humans being inherently selfish and greedy is literally a capitalist lie though, like that’s really really obviously not true if you look at how generous and willing to sacrifice themselves for someone else people are.

      • rbhfd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        People aren’t necessarily selfish, but they are tribal. They’ll go above and beyond for the people they know. Their family, friends, neighbours,…

        But this sympathy is rarely extended to people further away. From different towns, countries,…

        I believe most people are not purely selfish, but selfish people do seem to do extremely well under capitalism. (Not making any statements on other economic systems though)

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          right, and this is why it’s so important that we have systems that take in mind how humans work.

          Capitalism is horrendous for this reason, it explicitly and directly incentivizes the worst parts of humanity and results in a downward spiral of selfishness and dehumanization.

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t say “rarely” the entire liberal political movement is based on treating people we don’t know and will never know with decency.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          you do realize china is a capitalist dictatorship, and the soviet union was also turned into a dictatorship, right?

          Pointing at dictatorships and acting like they’re some amazing gotcha for an ideology they claim to follow is something even elementary grade school kids realize is dumb.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            China wasn’t capitalist under Mao.

            And yeah that’s kinda my point. You cannot have socialism without a dictatorship. That’s like explicitly in Marx’s writings. The term is dictatorship of the proletariat.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat

            It’s a fundamental cornerstone of Marxism. A dictatorship with a monopoly on force is necessary to transition from a capitalist society to a communist society by forcibly seizing the means of production and using force to prevent counterrevolution.

            The problem is that once you give that dictatorial power to a state, you can’t get it back.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t debate reality with commies because they don’t live in reality.

    • DreBeast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure. Maybe capitalism is just serfdom 2.0. We gotta keep it pushing tho. Maybe in a million years we will finally subvert our baser instincts and push past capitalism. Gotta do it for the kids

    • Elric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So by your logic any system is fine with the proper regulations in place. How about we go back to slavery then? Just make sure theasters are benevolent right?

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the most disingenuous take on what the poster was trying to articulate and you know it.

        Systems are corrupted by humans, not the fundamental tenets of said system.

        If this was not the case, then why does every socialist workers paradise fall into an authoritarian shithole each and every time a nation adopts it?