• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Per your example, I would hope the state steps in to help the guy down on his luck. And if he says no to help due to depression and possibly starting to become suicidal, then it is absolutely a good idea for the state to force him to get treatment before he becomes worse.

    How is letting him drink himself to death on the street the humane option?

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being suicidal is already a means we have of placing people on a psych hold.

      And yes, the state should intervene by offering help before the situation gets to this point, but we don’t actually have these social safety nets.

      If we did, and if we had means of getting people open to housing as an incentive for treatment, we could get a lot of willing people off the streets, into treatment, and housed, without force.

      This would serve 90% of people on the streets, in my experience from being in this situation myself and around other homeless addicts/mentally ill.

      For the reminder, we already have these laws. If a person is an immediate danger to themselves or others, it’s very easy to get a psych hold. Do we really need to extend this to everyone on the streets using substances to make their existence a bit more comfortable?