• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    We also shouldn’t have to rely on these cases to protect a woman’s inherent right to her body.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      An Unborn child isn’t “her body” (Let’s see how you spin this as a “Rape Apology”)

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Nothing to spin. It isn’t a child. It’s a fetus. That’s the whole crux of the debate. You think it’s a person, many of us do not. If this argument was the slam dunk you think it is then the entire debate wouldn’t exist.

        Are you so arrogant as to think you’ve solved arguably the most challenging and controversial ethics question of the modern era?

      • Dupree878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s using her body so she has every right to remove it in the same way it’s legal to shoot someone who’s on top raping her.

        It’s not her body. It’s a parasite