• jaemo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I treat people who have twitter accounts the same as I would someone who chain smokes in public areas: you’re part of the mesh that prevents the substrate for nice things to exist.

    Hopefully it’s as much of collective social stigma as smoking is soon.

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Unclear analogy - is the substrate going through the mesh the process of nice things existing? Maybe I’m thinking of substrate in a chemical sense rather than biological, or I’m just cooked. Is the mesh some sort of filter that allows bacteria to grow on the substrate (host)?

      • don@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I take it as they’re saying, “you’re part of a framework that prevents the foundation of good things from being.”

        • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Aye. That’s the idea. Even if we’re part of some weakly emergent system and hence exempt from what we normally ascribe to moral imperative, agency or personal accountability (to wit: it’s not technically immoral to just exist and have an account on Twitter, as opposed to just existing and using it as a platform to actively spread hate), tacit participation in it does mean you are part of the structure. Absent any human users, twitter is (even more) valueless.

          Revisiting the ‘substrate’ analogy: I used to keep freshwater fish. Twitter/it’s mob reminds me of a poorly maintained undergravel filter; full of poop, and lots of toxins leeching into the water.