A conversation between Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the Republican senator offered an "incredible historical document" showing how the U.S. views its role in the Middle East.
Context involves understand what the topic is that’s being spoken about. It is clearly mentioned in the article that this ban is solely about the Oct 2023 incident, nothing more. You just want to be deceitful and try to add information that had nothing to do with anything about any of this.
Maybe try to keep up with the subject or just be silent while the adults talk.
You want to make it seems like if genocide is warranted
No I didn’t, didn’t even make a reference to either way. Again, you are making things up because you are confused what’s being talked about
So yes, even though tiktok banned have been talked about in the past, control of information on subjects like the genocide is at stake here.
But that’s not what’s going on in this. The issue is that the article is claiming a future issue somehow controlled a multi-years long past event. Again, you are confused about what’s the subject.
Nobody said it was the sole reason. Straight up economical motivation (one have to notice the hypocrisy of accusing tiktok of being evil when facebook and twitter exists) and legitimate concerns about national security, whatever that means, are all recievable.
I can read, it’s you that’s been having the problem and keep circle jerking back to something that has nothing to do with anything said here. Maybe you should actually try to read the articles instead of pointing at some random link that you pulled out of nowhere that has nothing to do with this.
Context involves understand what the topic is that’s being spoken about. It is clearly mentioned in the article that this ban is solely about the Oct 2023 incident, nothing more. You just want to be deceitful and try to add information that had nothing to do with anything about any of this.
Maybe try to keep up with the subject or just be silent while the adults talk.
Removed by mod
No I didn’t, didn’t even make a reference to either way. Again, you are making things up because you are confused what’s being talked about
But that’s not what’s going on in this. The issue is that the article is claiming a future issue somehow controlled a multi-years long past event. Again, you are confused about what’s the subject.
Again, nothing about what I said.
You really have put the wtf in Lemmy. 🤡
Removed by mod
Oh, I have not denied you’re confused and lost about this entire subject.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I can read, it’s you that’s been having the problem and keep circle jerking back to something that has nothing to do with anything said here. Maybe you should actually try to read the articles instead of pointing at some random link that you pulled out of nowhere that has nothing to do with this.
👍
Removed by mod