his post on mastodon is here:

https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/113849098386232034

Dear Mark, I hope this finds you well. I noticed something interesting today - it seems Instagram is blocking links to my little open-source project. You know, the one that lets people share photos without harvesting their personal data or forcing algorithmic feeds on them. I have to admit, I’m flattered. Who would’ve thought a small team of volunteers could build something that would catch your attention? We’re just trying to give people a choice in how they share their memories online. No VCs, no surveillance capitalism, just code and community. Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people, not maximizing engagement metrics. Our project might be tiny compared to Instagram, but we’re staying true to that original spirit of social media - giving people control over their online presence without turning them into products. You could’ve ignored us. Instead, by blocking our links, you’ve given us the best endorsement we could ask for. You’ve confirmed what we’ve been saying all along - that big tech is more interested in protecting their walled gardens than fostering genuine innovation. Every time you block a link to our platform, you remind people why we built it in the first place. Your action tells them there are alternatives worth exploring, ones that respect their privacy and agency. So thank you, Mark. You’ve turned our little project into a symbol of resistance against digital monopolies.

  • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    291
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people

    I remember that it was about abusing the private information of all the “dumb fucks” who created an account.

    The letter is good though, but zucky will still be a billionaire whether he will read it or not.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Yeah also facebook started as an evolution of men rating women on his campus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Facebook#Facemash It should be no surprise that zuck has recently started proclaiming that he wants a more masculine corporate identity, it’s been that way from the beginning

      “The Kirkland Facebook (referring to the Kirkland House intranet) is open on my computer desktop, and some of these people have pretty horrendous Facebook pictures. I almost want to put some of these faces next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on which is more attractive.” - Zuck, 2003

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Wasn’t it about ranking female students by attractiveness or something?

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s just it. Zuck could sell off and close shop and live large for the rest of his life. And yet he chooses to fuck around with people instead.

      It’s weird.

      There’s creating. And then there’s harvesting content and creations of others. The former is the only one that makes you interesting.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        When you think about it, too, you realize these people have nothing good inside them. They seek power because externally people covet power. Normal people covet power because they want control of their own lives but mark has control and doesn’t fucking get it. He thinks power is inherently good so he steals it all away for himself but no matter how hard he trys he can’t look inward and find anything that means something more than that. It’s truly sad and grotesque. My mind could be set on 100 different paths that would fill me with so much satisfaction that nothing else would matter and mark can’t find one for himself.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It was first provided to college/edu addresses. It wasn’t what it is today at all.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I deleted my account when that came out, so I’ve been Facebook free since something like 2006.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Maybe it was 2008 instead of 06? Seemed like it came out very early, I’d only had an account for a year or so I think, shortly after it was opened up outside EDU domains.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Facebook was about, “connecting people” though. It was the first stage in its growth. It was also before monetization and was actively losing money.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        it was always all about the data, even back in the hot-or-not clone days.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It was about growing the user base so more data could be harvested, not about the connections being made.