technology@lemmy.world

  • AProfessional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    From the article

    The problem seems to revolve around brands that haven’t acquired this licensing

    It seems to just be rent seeking? Since it’s retroactive there probably isn’t a security change and malicious hardware can spoof being licensed, though this is unclear. So it probably only hurts legitimate small brands.

    • aluminium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah its probably rent seeking, I was just pointing out there are legit reasons to ban certain hardware.

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get your argument, but I’d say it makes room for a legit reason to control and identify hardware, not ban it.

        • aluminium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          absolutely, hence why I put forward the idea of an API that would allow games to stop people from joining multiplayer matches or flag their highscores if sketchy hardware is involved! For Single Player games, who cares!

          But deep down we all know that this first and formost is a money grabbing scheme from micro$oft