• cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The underlying tech is actually very cool and neat, unfortunately it got co-opted by cryptobros and bastardized :(

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Most of the 2nd and 3rd generation blockchains are much less energy intensive (although still more than a home PC).

            For example, Ethereum could be run on the energy equivalent of a single wind turbine.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Ethereum’s been proof-of-stake rather than proof-of-work for couple of years now, so it’s no longer energy intensive.

            There inherently can’t be a way to make proof of work lies wasteful as long as there are people who want to do the work. If you make hardware more, then it makes it cheaper to do the same amount of work, so people buy more hardware and do more work and more power gets used. If you make hardware less efficient, people just use the old hardware. You have to abandon proof of work altogether and switch it to something else that isn’t inherently tied to energy usage.

        • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          24 hours ago

          You took the words right out of my mouth! I think the blockchain is a very neat technology, but cryptobros completely ruined that.