• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You provide two links to random unrelated pages after having previously lied, claiming that sources had already been provided, entirely so that you could then repeat the lie and have something to point to, even though again, the links were irrelevant. Troll.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      No one lied crybaby.

      They aren’t unrelated you’re just retarded or arguing in bad faith. I’m know my guess as to which.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You literally did lie. You claimed I had been “provided sources” at a time when not a single source had been provided anywhere. That’s called lying.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m pretty sure someone else did, it’s irrelevant because I provided links and you didn’t bother to do any research you just discarded them by look alone. So again dumb or not arguing in good faith so you can drop the indignation as it’s fairly stale.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.

            Here’s a link that proves every claim you made this whole conversation is wrong. It literally says on this page that, in this specific comment chain, nobody had provide a link to a source at the time you claimed they had. The link is: https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/

            See, I can provide irrelevant links and lie about what they say just like you do.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.

              Who cares?! You have them now and you’re not bothering to use them because you don’t care you’d rather just object to object.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I literally did use them and they didn’t show anything you claimed they showed after I said they wouldn’t and you doubled down that they did. I literally provided screenshots. Liar and troll.

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I didn’t at first, then I went back and did.

                    How do you think I got screenshots of the page without visiting the page, exactly? Please tell me, I’m fascinated to hear your explanation.