PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoMilitaries ARE capable of learning, right...?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down12
arrow-up147arrow-down1imageMilitaries ARE capable of learning, right...?lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square4linkfedilink
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 month agoTo be fair here, they really did it because they liked it. “It” being the funny sounds of projectiles getting squashed against armor.
minus-squareSSTF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoI always figured the doctrine and procurement created mutual inertia against change. They like it because they have it, and they have it because they like it.
To be fair here, they really did it because they liked it.
“It” being the funny sounds of projectiles getting squashed against armor.
I always figured the doctrine and procurement created mutual inertia against change.
They like it because they have it, and they have it because they like it.