Cases against volunteers with Food Not Bombs were dismissed on Thursday, but the city attorney said he intends to press the issue.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 years ago

      if you’re going to do it on public property, do it at the site we’ve set up for this purpose

      From what I’ve seen when this was first posted on Lemmy, “the site we’ve set up for this purpose” was the former police headquarters. A lot of people, especially not rich people living unhoused, might not want to go onto police property, especially in a city like Houston.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        That’s an excellent point. It does surprise me that there’s only one designated public location. Houston is a huge place. You’d think there would be one in each district at very least.

        • chuckleslord@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 years ago

          …the point of the law is to stop people feeding the homeless. In their fucked up minds, if they make the city inhospitable to the people without money or resources, they’ll leave. Ignoring the fact that they don’t have the resources to do that. So it’s basically a “if you’re homeless, die quickly” law.

      • Vent@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 years ago

        Seminar sounds like the city can make it difficult by not offering it or charging some ridiculous price. Other than that, finding a business to let you use their parking lot once a week doesn’t sound that difficult. People do it all the time.