• kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This is why I never supported felons losing their right to vote. If they’ve served their nickel, give them the vote back. Otherwise, if they get a job and put 30% of their paycheck to paying taxes, then they’re being taxed without representation.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I agree, but it’s lesser to me than the means of disenfranchisement. If felons can’t vote and using cannabis is a felony then the deck is actively stacked against changing that law. And it gets darker when things like sodomy are felonies and with laws like tough on crime laws or prison reform. Felons are the people most severely impacted by the law

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Not only that, but losing voting rights wasn’t part of the sentence. If they want to take away rights (even in jail), it should be a part of the sentence, not something shoehorned in quietly.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Well you can also argue that due to the silly two party system no one (in the usa) is really represented. Hell its been forever since I can even remember ether party doing some representation (well maybe the Alaska rep selling out the rest of the nation for a bit of money? Maybe alaskens are dicks).

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You can still request the old plates, but nobody does. DC residents who aren’t in politics are incredibly politically homogenous. You would think the rest of the country would take that as a clue about how things actually work there…

        • hopesdead@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Well to my understanding, aren’t tax related things not controlled by them? Does Congress as a whole control those things?

          • Pacrat173@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Congress has the right to levy taxes under the Taxing and Spending Clause. However non voting members can’t vote on any laws and therefore can’t vote on tax related law . Wikipedia says They receive compensation, benefits, and the ability to send mail without a stamp like full house members. I’ve heard they can vote in committees but I can’t confirm that

            so I would say this is taxation without representation. Or taxation with the most minimal amount of powerless representation possible. But that’s a longer phrase

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        In theory, because every congressperson lives in DC a large fraction of the year, every one represents them. Giving them their own rep on top of that would give them too much power. In theory.

        • bitcrafter@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It would not be giving D.C. too much power because ultimately Congress governs D.C., not the local government which exists entirely at Congress’s pleasure, so this would at least give D.C. some influence over its own government rather than none, which is what it currently has.

        • mcv@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Congressmembers are only a minuscule fraction of the population of DC. And the rest of the population never voted for any of them. So the vast, vast majority of people in DC are unrepresented.

          • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yes, it’s silly to say they’re being represented. They don’t chose them and Representatives and Senators don’t give a hoot about what D.C. residents want on a national stage. They barely care what their constituents want. I have never heard them even mention the people of D.C. when talking about issues.

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    If Trump United States makes enough money on Tic-Toc he can afford to pay everyone’s taxes for them.

    • Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Did you listen to that bull…

      Like a watched it for 3 minutes or so…

      He said it would allow us citizens not to be worried about propaganda but also said when asked that he would want the whole thing to just have maga stuff in it… he can’t even keep up the lies man

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Most State Roads have a cutout in the geographical shape of the State. Washington’s is a cut out of George’s face