Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 months agoSomeone didn't think out the implications.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1977arrow-down115
arrow-up1962arrow-down1imageSomeone didn't think out the implications.lemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-squarejorge@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months ago but after first purchase her assets go up to 1.5bil and his assets go to .8bil Nope, his assets go to $0, as they belong to her now. What you propose is the economical equivalent of a perpetual motion machine
minus-squaregrendel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·9 months ago his assets go to $0 And to whom then Taylor Swift pays said 400million? They just disappear? Or do you assume Kanye is already owned by someone and the money goes to his actual owner, not Kanye himself?
Nope, his assets go to $0, as they belong to her now. What you propose is the economical equivalent of a perpetual motion machine
And to whom then Taylor Swift pays said 400million? They just disappear? Or do you assume Kanye is already owned by someone and the money goes to his actual owner, not Kanye himself?