Official Trump social media accounts have been using The Life of a Showgirl snippets to promote his agenda. Why has Swift, who once wanted ‘to be on the right side of history’, said nothing?
Yeah, you have a very interesting communication style as well, choosing one thing or another at your convenience. And gritty, too, even when someone is willing to meet you in the middle. I don’t see why I bothered.
Why would I want to argue with you when I’m trying to meet you in the middle?
The reason for my snark was you being disingenuous and rather condescending. Suggesting that an artist of that caliber would buy their ratings is the most ridiculous attempt at ridicule.
Oh yeah, you have. I noticed your slight change in choice of words.
You definitely did choose to ignore a clear factor I gave
You literally bent what you meant halfway down the thread to fit your narrative and pretended there was no other possible interpretation. Idk where you get that you’ve been quite clear.
I thought it was quite straightforward. “She cannot sing” isn’t the same as “she cannot sing well”. If I say “she can’t cook”, you’d imagine that her cooking is terrible because she lacks basic skills, but if I say “she can’t cook well”, you’d probably find her cooking tolerable because it’s understood that she can do it. It’s an interesting bit of backtracking.
Now it’s akin to writing a “scholastic research paper on anthropological communication” to point it out. Oh, sure. I thought you “weren’t aware” that a phrase could be interpreted any other way and look at you go flexing that fivehead. But I’m the one with an “astounding ability” to be selective about interpreting things. Right, I’m the one doing that.
Uh, literally? lol…
Oh yeah, definitely someone like her paid to be highly praised by her fans and critics alike. That makes sense.
deleted by creator
Yeah, you have a very interesting communication style as well, choosing one thing or another at your convenience. And gritty, too, even when someone is willing to meet you in the middle. I don’t see why I bothered.
deleted by creator
I was only snarky after you were, hon. I don’t know why you’re selectively choosing what to quote.
deleted by creator
Can you quote the second comment I made to you? That’d be a great start.
deleted by creator
Why would I want to argue with you when I’m trying to meet you in the middle?
The reason for my snark was you being disingenuous and rather condescending. Suggesting that an artist of that caliber would buy their ratings is the most ridiculous attempt at ridicule.
deleted by creator
Oh yeah, you have. I noticed your slight change in choice of words.
You literally bent what you meant halfway down the thread to fit your narrative and pretended there was no other possible interpretation. Idk where you get that you’ve been quite clear.
deleted by creator
I thought it was quite straightforward. “She cannot sing” isn’t the same as “she cannot sing well”. If I say “she can’t cook”, you’d imagine that her cooking is terrible because she lacks basic skills, but if I say “she can’t cook well”, you’d probably find her cooking tolerable because it’s understood that she can do it. It’s an interesting bit of backtracking.
deleted by creator
Now it’s akin to writing a “scholastic research paper on anthropological communication” to point it out. Oh, sure. I thought you “weren’t aware” that a phrase could be interpreted any other way and look at you go flexing that fivehead. But I’m the one with an “astounding ability” to be selective about interpreting things. Right, I’m the one doing that.