🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 7 days agoAnon sees through the liessh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square108linkfedilinkarrow-up1569arrow-down110
arrow-up1559arrow-down1imageAnon sees through the liessh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 7 days agomessage-square108linkfedilink
minus-squareUltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 days agoYou only ever need 3 whys
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoIt’s basic homeostasis, homie!
minus-squareDigitlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoI dont follow… How does limiting to 3 whys achieve homeostasis?
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoI just answer 1 why to every why cuz fucked if I know im only ever on here pooping and people do wirrd shit when they pooo
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoNa pretty sure this is where the off balance of homeostasis happens and the whys are the too much salt in the equation. My homeostasis reply only binds with thre initial why but has no relevance with the second layer of whys
minus-squareDigitlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI imagine this is similar to Socratic inquiry.
You only ever need 3 whys
Why?
It’s basic homeostasis, homie!
I dont follow…
How does limiting to 3 whys achieve homeostasis?
I just answer 1 why to every why cuz fucked if I know im only ever on here pooping and people do wirrd shit when they pooo
Why?
(Embrace the whyception)
Na pretty sure this is where the off balance of homeostasis happens and the whys are the too much salt in the equation. My homeostasis reply only binds with thre initial why but has no relevance with the second layer of whys
Why?
I imagine this is similar to Socratic inquiry.