• jon@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Medicine is any substance that has a demonstrable healthcare effect (demonstrated through double blind tests and not some rando’s anecdote). That includes natural substances.

    To put it another way, medicine and natural substances are not two mutually exclusive (i.e. disjoint) sets, as you and/or your doctor friend appear to be implying.

    • GBR24_B_S@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not what I’m saying.

      I agree a natural substance can be medicine.

      His statement - not mine - is that it couldn’t be patented.

      Therefore the profit is limited.

      Therefore there are fewer studies than a comparable pharmaceutical.

      Therefore when (not if) he is sued, he will be less able to defend himself.

      Therefore he won’t prescribe it.

      • jon@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for clarifying. Although I don’t agree with your doctor friend from an ethical standpoint, the point about natural products not being patentable is an interesting one and hadn’t occurred to me before.