• CeeBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can someone explain how a US state can legally/physically block access to anything from a US federal law enforcement agency?

    I genuinely don’t understand what’s going on here.

    • walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      110
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      1. Start breaking the law
      2. Someone says “that’s illegal, you can’t do that”
      3. Continue breaking the law
      4. Someone takes you to court
      5. Continue breaking the law
      6. Court decides you’re breaking the law, tells you to stop
      7. You say “oh, my bad” and stop
      8. There are no consequences for your transgressions and by the time the courts made a decision you had already achieved your goals.
    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      10 months ago

      Okay, here is the advanced legal analysis of the situation:

      Laws only matter when they’re enforced.

      That’s it. That’s what Texas is banking on.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Laws only matter when they’re enforced.

        Applies to the big orange mobster and GOP too.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is a big Republican tactic. If the Republicans [aka the GOP] have control of a state government, they can pass a law that they know will be struck down in Federal court. Say they mandate that all classrooms have a cross on the wall. The Left has to spend time and money fighting the law. Meanwhile, the GOP can tell their voters that they, the GOP, are protecting the rights of the persecuted Christians. Since the GOP runs the state government, they don’t have to pay for the law suits out of their own pockets, the taxpayers foot the bill.

      It a political theater that panders to their base, and costs the Left money to fight.

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I would assume the military

        Edit: and yes I realize that would be very close to civil war territory, and yes I would assume the Texas State people involved would probably be hanged