Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoOutrage as Oklahoma Republican’s bill labels Hispanic people ‘terrorists’www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1290arrow-down17cross-posted to: usa@kbin.socialnews@hexbear.netnews@hexbear.netglobalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1283arrow-down1external-linkOutrage as Oklahoma Republican’s bill labels Hispanic people ‘terrorists’www.theguardian.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square48fedilinkcross-posted to: usa@kbin.socialnews@hexbear.netnews@hexbear.netglobalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squareTransplantedSconie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·edit-28 months agoNope. If it did it would have included both lines together. It literally lables anyone Hispanic as being a terrorist right from the get go.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·8 months agoThere’s an “and” in the second statement. It requires all three to be true. Still a horrible racist law. If they want gangs to be labeled terrorists, just drop the Hispanic requirement and go after all of them.
minus-squareTransplantedSconie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoShouldn’t the “and” be in the first statement as well to link them all together? Any person who is of Hispanic *and member of a gang *and Convicted of yada yada yada. The way it is written doesn’t link the first two together. It’s its own statement of law.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·8 months agoThat’s what the semicolons are for. It’s like saying “red, white, and blue”. You don’t need to say “red and white and blue”.
minus-squareCowlitz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoExcept in this country where the courts can’t read and just makes up whatever it wants. Easier to do the less explicit things are.
minus-squarezoostation@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down6·8 months agoNo, the bill clearly has a three part definition of a terrorist. One part is race related, but the other two that must be satisfied are about gang activity.
Nope. If it did it would have included both lines together. It literally lables anyone Hispanic as being a terrorist right from the get go.
There’s an “and” in the second statement. It requires all three to be true.
Still a horrible racist law. If they want gangs to be labeled terrorists, just drop the Hispanic requirement and go after all of them.
Shouldn’t the “and” be in the first statement as well to link them all together?
Any person who is of Hispanic *and
member of a gang *and
Convicted of yada yada yada.
The way it is written doesn’t link the first two together. It’s its own statement of law.
That’s what the semicolons are for. It’s like saying “red, white, and blue”. You don’t need to say “red and white and blue”.
Except in this country where the courts can’t read and just makes up whatever it wants. Easier to do the less explicit things are.
No, the bill clearly has a three part definition of a terrorist. One part is race related, but the other two that must be satisfied are about gang activity.