alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoCarbon released by bottom trawling ‘too big to ignore’, says studywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1170arrow-down11cross-posted to: science@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.onlinetidalpunk@slrpnk.net
arrow-up1169arrow-down1external-linkCarbon released by bottom trawling ‘too big to ignore’, says studywww.theguardian.comalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: science@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.onlinetidalpunk@slrpnk.net
minus-squareTimecircleline@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·10 months ago370 million is just under 1% of 37.5 billion. It’s obviously far from the majority but I can see it being something that should be addressed.
minus-squareNegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoOh, agreed. I just think there are better metrics we can point at other than carbon release for why bottom trawling is a terrible thing for the environment.
minus-squareTimecircleline@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoGotcha. That makes total sense.
370 million is just under 1% of 37.5 billion. It’s obviously far from the majority but I can see it being something that should be addressed.
Oh, agreed. I just think there are better metrics we can point at other than carbon release for why bottom trawling is a terrible thing for the environment.
Gotcha. That makes total sense.