• giacomo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ah yes, because it’s not about doing what is right, it’s about political gain. Fuck america so so much.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      In theory the two are supposed to be aligned. Political will is supposed to go up when the politicians do what’s right and down when they do wrong. That’s what is going on here but I agree that they aren’t usually aligned.

      • Cowlitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not really. I highly doubt it will be rescheduled prior to election when they are just talking about it now.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol he’s actually taken steps to reschedule it, I know you probably wish we were in a dictatorship where Biden could just say, “weed is now legal, Trump will now be put in jail, and top republicans are to be killed” but we don’t live in that world thankfully. He started the process to reschedule marijuana in 2022, with the last update being from the DEA on December 2023 being that they are reviewing whether to reschedule marijuana and what to reschedule it as. I assume if Biden just signed an executive order to change it, it would have been held up in the courts and probably overturned because of not going through a formal process ( imagine if Biden could just unilaterally make fentanyl street legal).

            • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s literally the process he’s going to now. Not to mention it’s actually beneficial for him politically. It’s pretty sad how little you know about politics, yet you feel the need to discuss it.

          • beardown@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            imagine if Biden could just unilaterally make fentanyl street legal

            Would clear up some problems for Hunter, at least

        • htrayl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The election cycle.

          It doesn’t matter if people support it if they don’t remember it well enough to come out to vote when it matters. You see this with Biden already, people completely missing the effort they have made for tons of work that people support.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yet republican voters are far more dedicated to voting because the republican party makes bold promises and pushes to do them. Even if it’s as stupid as a border wall, they’ll make that promise and actually get funding for it and build at least part of it. Democrats, though, “it’s not feasible”, “it’s not possible”, “we can’t do that”, “it’s not realistic”. If democrats would show that they at least try, voters would try. No, forgiving a few billion in student loans here or there after letting the problem build up to 1.7 trillion dollars isn’t enough effort. What if instead they said “we will eliminate student loan debt completely” and then work on it, instead of hitting up low-hanging fruit like enforcing existing student loan forgiveness programs that forgive after 10+ years of interest payments?

    • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s kind of inevitable, and not such a bad thing. The president is one person. One person shouldn’t be deciding what is right arbitrarily. For the president to be looking at what the people want, that’s a good thing. Now, our democratic systems are deeply flawed, so that “what the people want” and “what improves electoral chances” are not as closely tied as they should be, but that’s another matter.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah it’s basically baked into the system. Politicians will be politicians and there are other checks and balances like the vote that are supposed to keep them reigned in. Not excusing bad behavior on the part of politicans, but as voters we could excercise more control over them if we were more educated and organized. There are too many crappy politicians that aren’t afraid for their jobs.

        This is obviously simplifying and ignores other urgent problems like gerrymandering, vote suppression, and money in politics.

    • zak@lemmy.l0l.city
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s not even what’s right in full. Rescheduling helps get us towards legalization someday but rescheduling probably also means people are still going to be sitting in jail for possession until well after 2028.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why not both, though. Plus not letting Trump be the president (which happens through political gain) is doing what is right.